Daily WHUFC News - 3rd May 2018

Second Chance Scheme Graduate Signs For CSKA Sofia
WHUFC.com

West Ham United Foundation's Second Chance Scheme has grown rapidly over the
last two years, and its success is now starting to translate into fantastic
results for it's participants. Valentin Obretenov, a Goalkeeper on the
programme, has recently signed a professional contract with CSKA Sofia in
Bulgaria, and he couldn't be clearer about how the scheme helped him to get
where he is today.

Speaking to whufc.com, Valentin said: "I am so happy to be where I am now
and without the Foundation's support over the past two years I wouldn't be
where I am today. From exposing me to full-time football and education
alongside the Academy and pushing me to play Non-League Football I will be
forever grateful. Sam Taylor, Jim Hampsheir and Kosta Stavrev are three
people I would like to say a big thank you to."

The Second Chance Scheme is a two-year, full-time education and football
development programme, offering the opportunity to study a wide-range of
subjects across a broad range of qualifications, including A-Levels. Open to
talented footballers aged between 16 and 18, the Second Chance Scheme gives
released footballers another opportunity to make it in football – and
Valentin's story is just one of a number of growing success stories.

Sam Taylor, Football Integration Manager at West Ham United Foundation,
said: "For me this shows what a fantastic programme the Second Chance Scheme
is. It's often talked about in football, but our scheme is genuinely
offering pathways for these boys, and with Val signing professionally for
CSKA Sofia, along with creating full international players just shows the
power of our programme and is a testament to the hard work we're all putting
in to get it right."

Bryan Glover, Head of Football Development at the Foundation, said: "Again
this is another great example of how well the Second Chance programme is
working in partnership with the Academy. As a Foundation we have produced a
full International and now our first professional footballer with hopefully
many more to come. I really do hope to see Val in the Champions League at
some point in the near future!"

The Second Chance Scheme, along with the full range of Learning Academy
programmes, are heading into a new year and the Foundation are looking for
new players. If you are aged 16-18 and hoping for a future in the
professional game, get in touch today!

Email staylor@westhamunited.co.uk for more information on the Foundation's
football schemes.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Zabaleta: We have to be positive
WHUFC.com

Pablo Zabaleta says the Hammers have to remain positive as they head into
the final three games of the season searching for the points they require to
make sure of their Premier League status.

Having suffered defeats in tough assignments against Arsenal and Manchester
City, West Ham face Leicester City, Manchester United and Everton in the
final week of the season with their destiny in their own hands.

Zabaleta believes one win, or four points, will mean they will not have to
worry about what the teams below them achieve – a situation he wants to be
in as quickly as possible.

"It's still in our hands," the No5 said. "We have to go for the three points
in our next game, that's it.

"Leicester lost against their last game against Palace, then we have
Manchester United and Everton at home, so it's in our hands.

"Yes, Sunday's result wasn't good, but we have to forget that game, be
positive and move into the next game thinking we can get the three points.

"One more win, or four points, could be enough to be safe 100 percent. We
cannot wait on Swansea, Southampton or Stoke to keep dropping points. We
have to think about West Ham and getting three points."

The experienced defender is well aware that his team need to improve if they
are to achieve that target, but says the return of Manuel Lanzini, who got
an hour of football under his belt against the Citizens, could help towards
that.

He added: "We knew Sunday was going to be a tough game – we were playing
against the champions, the best team in the league. No excuses, they were
miles better than us and now we have to move on to the next game.

"Manuel is one of the most creative players in our team. He's not had a good
time in terms of injuries, but to have Manu back in the team is good news,
so hopefully he can help us get some points in the next games.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham striker Andy Carroll apologises to manager David Moyes following
row
BBC.co.uk

West Ham striker Andy Carroll has apologised and returned to training after
a row with manager David Moyes. Carroll was sent home from training on
Monday after Moyes was unhappy with him leaving the bench early in Sunday's
match against Manchester City. Moyes made a triple substitution during the
game, a 4-1 defeat, and Carroll headed to the dressing room early. It is
understood he was sent home after he refused to apologise on Monday. The
club now considers the matter settled. Javier Hernandez, Joao Mario and
Arthur Masuaku were sent on in the second half against City, leaving a
frustrated Carroll to depart for the dressing room and not return before
full-time.
Speaking after the match, Moyes said: "It's something I'll deal with. In
this situation what you need is everybody to be a team member, so if he has
done that, I'll look at it and I'll deal with it."
West Ham are three points clear of the Premier League relegation zone with
three games to play. They travel to Leicester on Saturday (15:00 BST) for
their next match.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham 1-4 Manchester City (And Other Ramblings) - A Letter to David
Sullivan
KUMB.com
Filed: Wednesday, 2nd May 2018
By: HeadHammerShark

Dear David,

This is one of those open letters. God, how tedious of me. I've become one
of "those" people. I know, I know - I should be better than this. But then
again, so should our team after eight years of your ownership and instead
we're going to either go down or survive with fewer than forty points.
Neither of us have much to shout about.

First question - where on earth do you get your jackets?

I should be writing about this game, but to be honest, I've got nothing left
to say about West Ham capitulating at home. I've seen this game a dozen
times already at the London Stadium since you moved us there. I don't know
how many more times I can say that Cheikhou Kouyate is no longer in control
of his own legs, or describe Javier Hernandez nearly breaking out into a
walk.

So let's just talk, you and I. Two seriously pissed off West Ham fans with
an eye on the future.

I'm guessing that this weekend was tough for you. Perhaps I'm naive but I
still believe that you are a genuine supporter, albeit one with a remarkably
high tolerance for the team you support being abysmal. I suspect it must be
galling for you to sit in Director's Boxes with the officials of clubs like
Burnley, Swansea and Brighton and have to offer up polite chit chat while
the team you have assembled at such great cost gets destroyed in front of
you. I can't believe that at least a couple of them haven't at least leaned
over and whispered something along the lines of "David, old chap, not to pry
but exactly how incriminating are the photographs that Patrice Evra has of
you?".

You're not a quitter, you say. You're not walking away from a job half done.
Fair enough, I suppose, although I think you might be pushing the limits of
the word "half" there. It's the standard rhetoric of people in jobs that are
beyond them, but which remunerate them handsomely. And rest assured, I think
we are all aware that the several million pounds of interest that the club
pays you each year probably helps to while away the hours on those long
drives back down the M1 after yet another Northern shellacking.

I happen to think that people who refuse to quit when they aren't up to the
task are selfish. People mocked Kevin Keegan mercilessly but by resigning as
England manager in 2001 he helped England to reach a World Cup, by admitting
he wasn't up to it. I find that infinitely more courageous and honourable
than sticking around despite all the evidence being that you don't possess
the ability to do your job. I'm. Just. Saying. David.

***

But let's not get ahead of ourselves here. For our story begins some time
ago. 2010, to be precise, and West Ham was a club on the precipice. We were,
according to the BBC, "in 16th, in a season plagued by injuries and off
field distractions". Seems a little outlandish, I know, but that's what they
said.

You described the situation thusly - "We have a short term goal to stay in
the Premier League, and in the long term we'd like to be challenging for the
top four and the Champions League....the club has such an unbalanced squad.
We will be honest with the fans about the books and the crazy wages the
Icelandic owners paid out that has brought the club to its knees".

I won't lie, David, that last one is my favourite.

You finished up by saying "We're taking on a huge task at a club with
enormous problems. It will take time for us to turn it around". Remember
what we were saying about a job half done? Time travellers from 2010 might
wonder if you've even started at all.

I should also add that there was also some stuff about how you always
supported your managers, right before you fired Gianfranco Zola and replaced
him with Avram Grant. For a bet, possibly. Anyway, we're five managers in
now so I always figured that one was probably a joke.

Plus ca change and all that, but I wonder if you ever sit at home, looking
at those life-size waxwork butlers of yours and wonder whether you are in
some mythical Greek hell?

I know I do.

In the same way that Tantalus is forever doomed to stand in a pool of water
that recedes whenever he bends down to try and drink it, you seem destined
to sit in the bottom half of the Premier League and watch poorer, smaller,
but smarter, clubs breeze past you.

It puzzles you, I'm sure, that fans aren't more grateful to you for saving
us. I suppose that can be put down to the fact that a lot of fans don't
really think you did. They saw a very wealthy individual swooping in and
picking up a distressed asset that was always likely to produce a return
with even a modicum of investment. Harsh, I suppose, but there you go.

There can be no denying that the clubs finances look an awful lot healthier
now than they did in 2010, but of course this is largely due to the
explosion in television rights. While Karren Brady might like to brag about
turning around a failing business, most of us are a bit nonplussed by all
that. The single best decision you made was to employ Sam Allardyce, at
obscene expense, to ensure the club was back in the Premier League when the
gravy train rolled into town. And if ever there was a man unlikely to miss a
gravy train...

***

I have no doubt that you are perplexed as to why exactly a home defeat to
Manchester City would inspire all this angst among supporters. After all,
City beat everybody, have unlimited funds and scored a couple of flukey
goals. Their dominance says an awful lot more about the job being done by
the men who run the Premier League and UEFA than it does about you. And, in
isolation I'd agree with you.

I don't understand why so many fans are upset about a supposed lack of
effort when it seems clear to me that David Moyes had instructed the team to
sit off and hold their shape to try and deny City space behind our defence.
We did this at the Etihad to great effect, and I suppose you could say it
sort of worked here for about ten minutes. City scored through a deflection
and an own goal, both of which were unfortunate but exactly the kinds of
goals that you let in when you are shit. And David, before you protest, we
are absolutely fucking shit.

But I'm not sure it's this particular defeat that's really the point here.
It's the fact that every single one of us knew it was coming. I knew it was
coming. You knew it was coming too. I know you did.

Since moving to the London Stadium we have played the current Big Six on
thirteen occasions. We have won three (God bless London derbies), drawn
once, and lost nine. In those games we have scored ten goals and conceded
thirty four. Holy Shit, Dave! THIRTY FOUR. It's not just that we're
terrible, it's that we're reliably terrible.

We've never once scored four goals in a game at our home ground, and yet
Manchester City have done it three times. Once upon a time you could judge a
teams title credentials by how they fared at Upton Park, but under your
watch, we now get to see how they would play in testimonials. I honestly
thought Kevin de Bruyne was going to fall asleep yesterday.

Whether you accept it or not, the fact that we don't even remotely compete
in games against one third of the division is a pretty good reason for the
widespread apathy that is surging through your core support like poison
through a bloodstream.

***

But I'm sure, you're sitting there fed up at having your efforts ripped to
shreds. What of Dimitri Payet? What about that season of finishing seventh?
And you'd be right. That was a great season. You should have bought a decent
striker in January, of course, but instead did it on the cheap and missed
out on a Champions League spot that was begging to be taken. I often wonder
about that, and I'm sure you do too. Some better refereeing and Charlie
Austin instead of Emmanuel Emenike and who knows where we would all be right
now.

But if wishes were horses, I'd be dragging Nigel Farage through the streets
of Calais behind my carriage. We blew it and then returned immediately to
the stagnant mediocrity that has been the hallmark of your ownership.
Barring that one marvellous season when the Premier League went crazy, big
teams fell and little teams rose and bloody Leicester won the league, we
have been unrelentingly boring to support. I can describe it in no other
way. West Ham on the pitch are generally one of the most tedious sides in
the land.

We just... exist. Drifting aimlessly through seasons, lurking in the bottom
half of the table leaving nary a footprint in the sand. All of our impact is
on the back pages, as we lurch from crisis to crisis, amusing the world as
we go. We are irrelevant on the pitch and shambolic off it, and there is
nobody to be blamed for that other than you. I resent being asked to give
you my season ticket money before the end of the season because I feel like
I will just be endorsing you to go out and waste it once more.

Let me ask you a question, David, if I may. Is there any challenge in your
role? By which I mean, does anyone ever tell you that what you're doing is
wrong? If not, perhaps you ought to ask yourself why.

Once, many years ago, I worked for a brief time at a place that had a "hands
on" owner. The company had two security guards, one of whom worked from 5am
until 1pm, and the other from 12pm until 8pm. They had a handover period of
one hour in the middle. One day the owner turned up for an operations
meeting and noticed them both at reception. Troubled by such an unnecessary
display of manpower, he told his operational team to fire one of them
because it was ludicrous to waste money like that. Given how long ago it
was, this might have saved the company around £25,000 per year.

The problem with this was that it meant we had one security guard to cover
fifteen hours. In the end, he did the early shift and the company paid the
landlord of the building to have someone come and lock up. The cost of this
service? £40,000 per year.

Whether that is apocryphal or not, I don't know, but it was told around the
corridors as being true. And nobody was surprised because the distinguishing
characteristic of that business was that anybody close to the owner just
mumbled in agreement and told him what he was saying was great. It led to a
very well-paid senior management and a very poorly run company.

Challenge is a good thing, David. People disagreeing with you is healthy,
because it introduces some rigour to your decision-making process. Getting
people into positions of seniority who have a backbone and some vision is a
really healthy thing for a company to do. I understand that long-term
strategic thinking wasn't a huge part of your success in porn or property,
but it couldn't be more vital to the industry in which you currently
operate. You keep telling us that the manager must have the final say on
transfers despite employing five in eight years. Any player signing on
anything longer than a two year deal is likely to outlast the manager he
signs for. Can you not see that this is a nonsense?

If nothing else, please look around. Examine what is working for those other
smaller clubs who have gone skating past you so easily. You need some help.
You've done your best, no doubt, but there is so much more intellectual
horsepower in those clubs it's not even a fair fight. They have long term
business plans that allow them to think further ahead than the next transfer
window, and they don't lurch alarmingly from one crisis to another. It's
pretty tough to admit, but when your business is failing and you've changed
the staff, the place you do business and the management then perhaps it
might be time to admit that the only thing left to change is...you.

***

But before you get too excited about making lots of changes, David, I'd like
to ask one more thing of you. When you come to make those decisions - please
don't do anything for public approval. I know it's been your preferred
method to road test ideas by disseminating them through various social media
outlets and then gauging public response, but this highlights everything
that is wrong with your leadership. Your job isn't to satisfy fans before
the season, it's to do it at the end.

I know fans are a nightmare. How can you appease people who scream that they
want a high energy pressing game and then scream even louder for Hernandez
to be on the pitch? What hope do you have of reasoning with people who
insist on playing 4-4-2 without acknowledging that we don't actually have
anyone who can play wide in midfield? Where do you go with supporters who
criticise Moyes for not instilling a sense of organisation and
professionalism into his team and then side with professional waster Andy
Carroll because he didn't walk straight back into the team after being out
for months? What is up with people who plaster pictures of themselves in the
San Siro all over their social media accounts and then tell you they're
giving up their season tickets because they're sick of the number of
tourists in the stadium?

But that's the point, really - fans are emotional and illogical and moody,
but the simple thing we all want is success. Produce a better team and we
will fall in line. You need to stop taking short cuts and start working to
some semblance of a plan. Or better yet, employ some people to design and
implement that plan, because this current squad you have assembled is one of
the worst I've ever seen and fans have every right to be pissed off about
it.

None of which is to say that fans aren't important. We're crucial. But we
need you to listen to us on other things, because you've currently got it
the wrong way round. And so you stay silent when our fans are threatened,
when the stewarding is unsafe, when we are campaigning for safe standing and
when that godforsaken fucking stadium turns out to be a total disaster, but
find the time to canvas opinion about whether we should sign El Hadji Diouf.
This is madness.

Any business making strategic decisions to gain short term approval from
their customers is doomed to fail. If you had any belief in your own vision,
you wouldn't care remotely for public opinion. Instead we have this strange
briefing against Moyes now to prepare the ground for letting him go in the
summer. I happen to think Moyes would be a poor appointment, but still the
best you could realistically manage, although either way that's not terribly
important.

What's important is your long term plan. How do you want to play? What type
of team are you trying to build? What profile of player are you targeting
and how do you plan to attract them? If Moyes is your ideal candidate then
back him and commit to the plan. The problem is that you and I both know
that no such template exists. Instead, everything is geared to short term
survival and kicking problems down the road until you eventually sell the
club and can leave them for the next guy to resolve.

And there's the rub. When you took us from Upton Park you ripped the soul
out of the club. But crucially you didn't replace it with anything. I would
suggest that the only thing that could really have worked is to have
replaced it with a brain. A razor sharp, young, progressive, cutting edge
managerial set up that could have bridged the gap between us and the elite.
I can't tell you how often I daydream of West Ham Red Bull, David, because
it would be no further removed from the West Ham of my youth than your
version, and a damn sight more successful.

Instead...nothing. Just the same unimaginative approach that you have always
employed, and in the end it has led us to where you have always ended up. At
the bottom.

I should add that none of this is personal. I think you're a businessman who
saw an opportunity to profit and you took it. But the issue is that you
haven't given us anything. Absolutely nothing. Not the stadium, not the
team, not the managers, not the Academy, not even any glimmer of hope for
the future. And if your plan is to just hang on to the club until the
restrictive covenants are lifted and then sell for the biggest profit
possible, then you need to be aware of what that will mean for your legacy.
And perhaps you won't care, and perhaps your sons won't care, but you'll be
forever known as the guy who destroyed West Ham.

I hope it doesn't come to that, David, I really don't. It doesn't need to.
We have attributes that other clubs would kill for. Stand aside and let
people who know what they are doing utilise them. Look to Kevin Keegan -
admit you're not up to it. There really is no shame in it.

Yours sincerely,

HeadHammerShark
Disgruntled of Block 256

Please note that the opinions expressed in this article are those of the
author and do not necessarily represent the views of, nor should be
attributed to, KUMB.com.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Andy Carroll returns to West Ham training after apologising to David Moyes
By Sky Sports News
Last Updated: 02/05/18 5:08pm
SSN

Andy Carroll returned to training on Wednesday after apologising to manager
David Moyes, Sky Sports News understands. Carroll was sent home from
training on Monday having refused to apologise for leaving the bench and
heading down the tunnel during West Ham's 4-1 defeat by Manchester City on
Sunday. Sky Sports News understands Carroll has apologised to Moyes and is
hoping to play a part as the Hammers head for a crucial match in their
relegation fight at Leicester on Saturday.
Striker Carroll was clearly frustrated as he remained on the bench as an
unused substitute before disappearing down the tunnel towards the end of the
game. In his post-match interview, Moyes promised to "deal with it", and the
pair were involved in a heated exchange before the Scot sent Carroll home on
Monday.
After a 4-1 loss to the champions left the Hammers just three points outside
the drop zone with three games left, Moyes told Sky Sports: "In this
situation, what you need is everybody to be a team member."
Carroll, 29, has made 16 appearances for West Ham this season, as he has
continued to struggle with injury problems. He was also sent off against
Burnley last October.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Diego Poyet interview: How former Charlton and West Ham prodigy is getting
back on track in Cyprus
By Will Unwin
Last Updated: 02/05/18 4:22pm
SSN

From Charlton and West Ham to Argentina and Cyprus, Diego Poyet tells Sky
Sports about his unusual career path - and why he's optimistic about the
future...
When Diego Poyet left Charlton in the summer of 2014, having helped them to
Championship safety and won the club's player of the year award barely four
months after making his debut, the teenager looked set for the top. But four
years on, the former England U18 is rebuilding his career away from the
microcosm of football in this country. After two years of stagnation at West
Ham and a hellish six months in Argentina, Poyet is finally reigniting a
career that promised plenty and stepping out of his father Gus' shadow by
starring in the Cypriot First Division for Paphos. It wasn't the path he
pictured taking as a Charlton academy ace, splitting his time between
developing through the youth system and watching his father shine in the
Premier League. But the 23-year-old is happy to be back on track and excited
about the future.

"Pathos had a new manager, new players, so I thought let's just go for it
and signed for a year to get my head straight after Argentina," Poyet told
Sky Sports. "That was very important for me, to have no distractions. It's
been better for Argentina, that's for sure! "As you see with my last moves I
am open to new experiences but if something comes up in the UK then I'm all
for it."

As a teenager, Poyet played for England youth sides before eventually making
his debut for Charlton aged 18, having joined the club six years
previously.The Valley was not an ideal place to be at that time. The club
were in a relegation battle and controversial owner Roland Duchatelet had
just taken over - and he quickly removed Chris Powell after he handed Poyet
his debut. New manager Jose Riga arrived and the club were saved from
relegation, with Poyet earning plenty of praise in the process. "People say
'it must have been hard starting off with a team bottom of the league' but I
love a challenge," Poyet says, recalling those early days of his career.
"Being bottom of the table in the Championship and going straight in is
quite hard to do but I would rather do that than being 21 or 22 and being
nowhere near the first team in the Premier League because the club can just
buy a new player. "In the Championship or League One you have more chances
as a young player, especially if you've been at the club a long time and
you've earned the trust of the manager, respect of the players and the
people at the club and they know what you can do."

Despite his success on the pitch, Charlton were slow to try to tie down the
out-of-contract Poyet to a new deal, making him wonder about his worth at a
club where he had grown up. "After about three or four weeks they contacted
me and I wasn't really pleased with the offer they gave me. I'd been at the
club six or seven years and had a close relationship with a lot of the
players and the offer made me feel under-appreciated, considering how long
I'd been at the club and I'd just won player of the year. "There was a
discussion where they weren't going to make another offer. I was a free
agent and I told them to forget about it and I wasn't going to turn up to
pre-season, I was going to look for another option. That is how I ended up
leaving a club that I had a lot of admiration and love for. I spent a lot of
time there. It was my hometown as well and I ended up leaving in a way where
most people don't know the truth. "The contract was offered, I said I wasn't
happy with it and then they started throwing in things like a loan move to
Standard Liege and this and that. I wondered if they wanted me at Charlton
why they would offer for me to go out on loan somewhere. It ended in not a
nice way but it is what it is and I'm sure it's happened to a lot of
players."

A desire to stay in London meant West Ham's offer was the most attractive to
the teenage midfielder who was looking for a place to blossom in the Premier
League. Sam Allardyce was the man who gave him a four-year deal but he would
only make three Premier League appearances for the club in his first season.
During his time in East London he would go out on three separate loan spells
and play in five Europa League qualifiers under Allardyce's replacement
Slaven Bliic, but it was not a period Poyet enjoyed. "The first season under
Allardyce I felt I would have to suck it up, get used to it and then in my
second season we had the Europa League qualifiers with Bilic and I played in
them, so I felt that the manager was showing faith in me, I did quite well,
we had a penalty shootout and took one, so after about a year I felt part of
the team. "I was being patient, I showed I wanted to be there but when we
went out of Europe, Bilic was honest with me and said my chances would be
limited and if I wanted to go out on loan I should just go."

After loan spells at MK Dons and back at Charlton, Poyet reported back for
his third summer at West Ham to be told by Bilic he could leave the club.
The midfielder decided he did not want to see out the final two seasons of
his contract. "A lot of people would have stayed but I get frustrated very
easily so if the manager says that to me, I feel like there's no real way of
winning someone's trust back," said Poyet. "I rang my agent, I told him to
get me out of there, I didn't care about anything, I just wanted to leave
and sign somewhere else. I didn't want to be somewhere I wasn't wanted, I
didn't care how long it took. "I was made to feel like a pest - I would turn
up to training and I would know the staff didn't want me there. I'd go into
training and no matter how well I did there was no reward. "I couldn't do
that, I couldn't be waiting on the manager to be sacked, as that means you
don't want your team-mates to do well and I'm not that type of person. I
don't want my team-mates to do badly so the manager gets sacked and I get an
opportunity, I always want them to do well."

After being offered moves to Derby County and Rangers, Poyet took the more
extreme decision to join Godoy Cruz in Argentina but nothing went right for
Poyet in South America - and a ruling on foreign signings left him illegible
to play in the league. "I decided to move across the world to play," he
explains. "In Argentina you can only have four foreigners at a time for each
season. The club I signed for already had four players but a Uruguayan
striker was set to leave the day after I arrived. He was their star striker
but he went to do his medical and failed. "It got out in the news, so the
other three players occupying the international player slots didn't want to
leave. So no one was going to sign the striker and I was left as the fifth
player. "I was there for six months and could only play in the Copa
Libertadores, where you can register new players for that but not for the
league. "It was a nightmare, it was the worst time of my life. I was in
Argentina, living by myself, training week in, week out and for six months I
could only wait for the Copa Libertadores. "When it came around, the manager
was hesitant to play me as I hadn't played a game in months and had to
decide if he wanted to play a player who hasn't played and isn't match fit.
It was a nightmare for me. I struggled on and off the pitch, as I was
struggling to play and I was away from home for the first time properly, so
it was a very hard time for me."

Last summer, Poyet found salvation after being tested by his time in
Argentina by joining Cypriot side Paphos, who are managed by former Coventry
boss Steven Pressley. "After suffering in Argentina I wanted to go back to
what I was used to, being back home with my family and friends," he said.
"But when I left Argentina, I couldn't find the right place in the UK,
people were asking about what happened in Argentina and I hadn't played many
games since joining West Ham. "People were saying 'he's moving around too
much', so I ended up going up to a new club in Cyprus, who had signed 30-odd
players, all from different places. "I was sat at home in England calling my
agent three or four times a day - I must have driven him crazy. It's been
better than Argentina, that's for sure."

The standard of football in Cyprus has surprised and impressed Poyet, who
feels he is just thankful to be back playing regularly as he looks to prove
to himself and those around him that he is his own man, something he has
proved about making difficult decisions about his own career. Pressley
arrived in Cyprus a month after Poyet, reminding the midfielder what he
misses about the country he was brought up in and the football there. "I
think he [Pressley] has had to adapt but he has brought that British
mentality - he has coached in League One and at top clubs - and he has
brought that into our team, which has been great for us. Him coming with his
staff has been massive for me. "When they came I called my dad and said
'they're making me miss England so much!' because this is what I am used to,
at Charlton and West Ham, that atmosphere, the training intensity and even
just speaking English. It has made me miss home and what I am used to."

Not one scared of bold moves, Poyet might need to consider another in the
summer, and really could end up anywhere if he decides against staying with
Paphos.
His dad, now managing Bordeaux, is always at the end of the phone if he
needs advice but Poyet Jnr has seen the good and the bad of football and
isn't fearful of what might come next as he continues his pursuit of his
dream to reach the top.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
WEST HAM'S PRIME DEFENSIVE TARGET 'TEMPTED' BY LUCRATIVE SWITCHFeatured
Image
Date: 2nd May 2018 at 9:00pm
Written by: Josh Challies

West Ham boss David Moyes has plenty of work to do this summer, although
he'll be focusing on the final three matches of the season after seeing the
Hammers dragged back into the relegation fight this weekend. A 4-1 defeat to
Manchester City has left Moyes' side just three points from safety with
three games remaining, while it also gives West Ham the unwanted record of
having the worst defence in the Premier League this season. As such, the
Hammers are widely tipped to rejuvenate their defensive ranks at the end of
the campaign and Fulham full-back Ryan Fredericks, who is set to be
available as a free agent, has been consistently linked with a move to the
London Stadium. West Ham have now been handed a boost as The Mirror stated
in their live blog (3:26pm) that the right-back is tempted by a lucrative
move across the capital, although there is still a chance he could sign a
new deal at Craven Cottage if his side secure promotion to the Premier
League.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
US Billionaire Paul Allen is interested in buying West Ham
By Adam Leatherbarrow - May 2, 2018 0

Paul Allen, owner of the Seattle Seahawks, is interested in buying West Ham
United from Gold and Sullivan, a source close to West Ham World claims. Paul
Allen famously co-founded Microsoft alongside Bill Gates which where the
bulk of his fortune originates from. He also owns MLS outfit Seattle
Sounders and NBA team Portland Trail Blazers as part of his privately held
company Vulcan Inc. Interestingly, during their 2016 pre-season tour in,
West Ham visited Seattle and trained at the Seahawk's VMAC training complex.
The Hammers lost 3-0 to Seattle Sounders at CenturyLink Field during that
tour. It appears Allen declared some interest in the East London team when
they had their first season in the London Stadium.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan is trying to recoup the money spent on London
Stadium from the 2012 Olympics and conversion costs by welcoming offers from
oversees to boost the NFL franchise in London. Khan had a helping hand in
the bid for Wembley Stadium from Fulham and Jacksonville Jaguars owner
Shahid Kahn and it is believed he is helping to sell The Hammers on behalf
of the club.
The Seattle Seahawks wouldn't be moving to London by the looks of it and it
is understood that no NFL games will be played in the stadium, but the land
surrounding the stadium in Stratford could be used as a base for the
Seahawks and visiting teams to train, as there isn't enough land around
Wembley Stadium to do this currently.
To add, Stratford's Olympic Park also has the Copper Box, which can be used
for NBA tours instead of using the O2 in North Greenwich.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham defender Pablo Zabaleta backs fit-again Manuel Lanzini to help club
to safety: 'He's one of the most creative players in our team'
Manuel Lanzini played for over an hour for the first time since March on
Sunday
Pablo Zabaleta believes his compatriot can help West Ham avoid relegation
The Argentine wants his team-mates to focus on getting a victory at
Leicester
By Aditi Prakash, Reuters
PUBLISHED: 15:32, 2 May 2018 | UPDATED: 15:39, 2 May 2018

Manuel Lanzini's return to form can propel West Ham towards Premier League
safety for next season, according to team-mate Pablo Zabaleta. Argentina
international Lanzini has been battling a persistent knee injury and played
over an hour for the first time since March in last weekend's 4-1 defeat by
champions Manchester City. The 25-year-old also notched an assist as a
second-half substitute in the defeat by Arsenal earlier this month and
Zabaleta believes his compatriot's gradual resurgence can help West Ham stay
out of the relegation battle. 'Manuel is one of the most creative players in
our team. 'He's not had a good time in terms of injuries, but to have Manu
back in the team is good news, so hopefully he can help us get some points
in the next games,' the 33-year-old defender told West Ham's website. The
defeat by City left West Ham in danger of being dragged into the relegation
battle as they sit 15th in the league, three points and positions above
18th-placed Southampton with as many matches left in the campaign. 'Yes,
Sunday's result wasn't good, but we have to forget that game, be positive
and move into the next game thinking we can get the three points,' Zabaleta
said. 'One more win, or four points, could be enough to be safe 100 percent.
We cannot wait on Swansea (City), Southampton or Stoke (City) to keep
dropping points. 'We have to think about West Ham and getting three
points.'
The London outfit will be aiming for just their third away win in the league
when they travel to ninth-placed Leicester City on Saturday.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

http://vyperz.blogspot.com

Daily WHUFC News - 2nd May 2018

Moyes targeting at least one more win to secure safety
WHUFC.com

David Moyes is targeting at least one more victory from West Ham United's
final three Premier League matches to secure the Hammers' top-flight status.
The Scot takes his team to mid-table Leicester City next Saturday before
closing the season with back-to-back home games with Manchester United and
Everton
With his side sitting three points above the relegation zone, Moyes believes
three more may be enough to stay up, and says the fact two of those
remaining matches will be at London Stadium is in West Ham's favour. "I'm
not as anxious as I was when I first came in because we were in the bottom
three then," said the manager, speaking after Sunday's 4-1 home defeat by
champions Manchester City. "The big job is to stay out of the bottom three
and we've got three games to go. "In the main, our form at London Stadium
has been pretty good and up until Sunday's game, we'd won three, drawn three
and lost one, so I'm hoping we can turn those last two home games into
points. We'll also go to Leicester next week, so if we can turn that or one
of the two home games into a win, then I think we'll be OK. "We had a really
difficult period when I came in when we had all the big teams and we're in
that period now in the second round of games, facing Chelsea, Arsenal and
Manchester City. "We've got Manchester United and Everton still to come here
at home and I hope that somewhere along the line, seeing as we're in
relatively good form at London Stadium, that we'll get the win we need."
Reflecting further on Sunday's defeat, despite his meticulous planning,
Moyes admitted that Manchester City simply had too much for his West Ham
team. The Hammers were unfortunate to concede twice to a deflection and an
own-goal before half-time, but the champions dominated for long periods and
added two fine team goals after the break to complete an emphatic victory.
"I think everyone is in appreciation of what Manchester City can do. I
wanted to challenge them and do better than we did, so I'm disappointed
overall that we didn't do better. The next time I manage against them I'll
try and do something different to stop them, but it's very hard. "They were
very good. Because of the way they play, the minute you try to effect
something, they'll change. Everybody will have a go at trying to beat them,
but you have to have a level of quality in your team. "Some teams will find
a way of doing it, but it's been hard for just about every team in the
Premier League and that's why they're runaway leaders this season."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Adrian aiming to keep starting place for Leicester City trip
WHUFC.com

If you were returning to play in goal in the Premier League after a
seven-week absence, the last opponent you would want to face was Manchester
City. But that was the task facing Adrian on Sunday, when he was back
between the sticks for West Ham United for the first time in six top-flight
matches. While the runaway champions deserved their 4-1 victory, the
Spaniard was not helped by City's first two goals came via a deflection off
Patrice Evra and an own-goal from Pablo Zabaleta. Gabriel Jesus and
Fernandinho added unstoppable second-half strikes to rub salt in the
Hammers' wounds, but the No13 was in philosophical mood as he reflected on
the manner of the defeat at London Stadium. "They showed that they are
champions and showed their quality, they played to another level and we
conceded we also conceded our first two goals to a deflection and an
own-goal," Adrian said. "After we scored to make it 2-1, we were into the
game, but then the first half finished and we conceded a third and a fourth
and they played passing football and we tried to defend as well as possible.
"They showed the quality and the pace they have all season and they have
great goalscorers and top-quality players to defend and the style they play
is hard to stop for 90 minutes."
Next up for West Ham is a trip to the King Power Stadium to face a Leicester
City side who have collected just one point from their last four matches and
lost 5-0 at Crystal Palace on Saturday. While it may look to be a favourable
fixture on paper, Adrian says the Hammers cannot and will not take the Foxes
lightly. "Leicester is an opponent more in our league. We have to get points
as soon as possible and we will move onto the next one. "We can't forget the
City game because we have to learn from our mistakes, but we have to go to
Leicester with maximum confidence and strength to get the three points
there. "We know they lost 5-0 on Saturday, but their last result doesn't
matter. We also lost, so we have to prepare as well as possible this week."
With Joe Hart eligible again, Adrian knows he may have to make do with a
place on the bench again, but the Spaniard's professionalism means he will
be ready to play, whatever David Moyes' final selection decision is. "I
tried to help as many times as possible. It's hard when you concede four
goals and you can't be happy with the result, but I'm happy to be back in
the team and playing again after a few games out. "I will work hard to give
the manager a decision for the next one and I hope I can play until the end
of the season. "The best thing in football is that you have another game and
we have our next one on Saturday and we need to give our best."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Haksabanovic: I have learned a lot in by first West Ham season
WHUFC.com

(gotta love the proof reading in the subject.. PeterR)

Many of the Premier League's very best talents have proved it often takes
time to adapt to new surroundings, a new country, a different style of
football. Didier Drogba found things difficult to begin with before becoming
a club legend at Chelsea. Dutch master Dennis Bergkamp's situation when he
first joined Arsenal was similar. And though at such a young age Sead
Haksabanovic has many years of progression ahead of him, the Montenegrin
admits his maiden campaign in England has been about learning and adapting.
Signed last summer from Swedish second tier side Halmstads BK – the club
which produced future West Ham United and Sweden midfielders Fredrik
Ljungberg and Niklas Alexandersson – the energetic winger has by his own
self-admission played fewer first-team matches than was hoped. But, one year
into life in east London, the 18-year-old believes he is much better for his
experience so far. "I would at this stage have liked to play more in the
first team than I have," he says. "That was the aim when I joined and that's
what I said when I signed in August. "But I have to look at the positive
things and the reasons why. I have learned a lot. The staff here have taught
me many things and I think I am a better player already than when I came
here. "Swedish football is very different. Here, it's more physical, it's
faster and it definitely took a while to get used to some parts of the game
over here. "But football is about learning and I am still young, so next
season will be about improving and hopefully progressing to play more
first-team football than I have this season."

Haksabanovic's one and only start in a West Ham shirt – for the senior team
– came back in September against Bolton Wanderers in a Carabao Cup tie,
while he also got some minutes on the pitch more recently in an Emirates FA
Cup clash at Wigan Athletic in January. He has impressed for the Hammers'
U23s, who look on course for a top-half finish in their first season at
Premier League 2 Division 1 level. And alongside the likes of Nathan
Holland, Dan Kemp, Grady Diangana and Martin Samuelsen, he is just one of an
exciting group of wingers hoping to burst onto the senior scene next season.
"We have a lot of great players in my position at the Academy," he
continues, "and we all learn from each other all the time; in training and
in matches. "Competition is healthy in any squad, because it pushes you to
be better and to prove that you are worth a place in a team ahead of
somebody else. It's the same in the first team; there are a lot of fantastic
footballers in the squad and training with them always helps me to be
better. "You learn from the coaches, from playing games, while picking up
things from your teammates and the more experienced players is also a big
help for any younger player. "The short-term target is to have a really good
pre-season, and then hopefully I can continue to perform to push forward and
progress."

If Haksabanovic can develop as well as the likes of Drogba and Bergkamp –
and Ljungberg and Alexandersson – did as their careers in English football
progressed, a big future at West Ham could be ahead of the teenager.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Hammers youngsters end season with stirring comeback
WHUFC.com

West Ham United's youngsters ended the 2017/18 season in dramatic style as
Bernardo Rosa secured a 2-2 U18 Premier League South draw with Aston Villa
with the last kick of the game. The Hammers were trailing 2-0 going into the
closing stages at Little Heath and looked set to end the campaign with a
home defeat.
However, schoolboy striker Veron Parkes halved the deficit on his full U18
debut, firing home a clinical finish, before Rosa (pictured, above) netted a
late, late leveller in the fifth minute of added time. A young starting XI
saw recent signing Joseph Anang in goal and schoolboy Josh Wilson-Esbrand
start at left-back alongside captain Ben Wells, Kevin Dalipi and Will
Greenidge. The midfield consisted of Rosa, Jay Mingi and Louie Watson, with
Parkes playing alongside Sean Adarkwa and the in-form Odysseas Spyrides in
attack. However, it was Villa who took control in the early stages, opening
the scoring through Michael Tait's goal within nine minutes. The visitors
looked to have secured all three points when substitute Jacob Ramsey put
them two goals clear with 13 minutes to play, but Parkes and Rosa had other
ideas. The 17-year-old's fourth and final goal of the season meant the
Hammers finished tenth in the 12-team South table, having won six, drawn
three and lost 13 of their 22 league matches. With 19 starts, Rosa topped
the appearance charts, while Spyrides and Korrey Henry each scored five
goals.

West Ham United: Anang, Wilson-Esbrand, Wells (c), Dalipi, Greenidge
(Appiah-Forson 63), Mingi, Watson, Rosa, Adarkwa (E.Longelo 70), Spyrides,
Parkes
Subs not used: Jinadu (GK), El Mhassani

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Loan watch: Martinez off the mark and Snodgrass shines
WHUFC.com

West Ham United loanee Toni Martinez scored his first goal for Real
Valladolid at the weekend. The striker swept home from seven yards to open
the scoring in a 1-1 draw with Cadiz on Saturday, keeping his side's hopes
of finishing in the promotion play-offs alive. Martinez, who was included in
the starting XI for just the second time since returning to his homeland in
January, believes Valladolid can make up the four-point gap between
themselves and the top six over the closing five rounds of the season. "We
are not going to throw in the towel," he told the club's official website.
"We have played very well and we believe that we can achieve it. We have
five finals and we will go for them, the first of them next Saturday at
Numancia. "The goal was a great play from the whole team. The change of
orientation of Michel, the patience of Toni, Nacho's well-timed run and
cross. "Now I do not think about whether I'm a starter or substitute, as
always, I just think about working to help the team."

Closer to home, Robert Snodgrass returned to the Aston Villa starting XI in
style, completing an impressive 90 minutes in Saturday's 1-1 Championship
draw with Derby County. The Scot was in superb form at Villa Park,
unleashing six shots, making five key passes and embarking on four dribbles,
as Steve Bruce's side came from a goal down to snatch a point through Lewis
Grabban's late equaliser. Villa are guaranteed to finish fourth with one
game to play and will most likely take on Middlesbrough in the Play-Offs.

At the other end of the same division, Reece Burke missed Bolton Wanderers'
2-0 defeat at Burton Albion. Martin Samuelsen was an unused substitute for
the Brewers, who won their third consecutive league match to climb to 22nd
in the table. Samuelsen's Burton need to secure at least a draw at Preston
North End – who need a win themselves to have any chance of leapfrogging
Derby into the final Play-Off place – to give themselves a chance of
avoiding relegation. Burke's Bolton need to beat Nottingham Forest at home
and hope both Burton and Barnsley, who travel to Derby, fail to win to stay
up.

In Germany, Reece Oxford missed Borussia Monchengladbach's 1-1 Bundesliga
draw at Schalke 04 through injury.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Browne nominated for Player of the Month award
WHUFC.com

Marcus Browne has been nominated for the Premier League 2 Player of the
Month award for the second time this campaign with his inclusion on the
shortlist for April. The 20-year-old has enjoyed a fine month, captaining
the Hammers' U23s as they finished the season in – as it stands – a top half
position in Division 1. The playmaker, who was also shortlisted – as voted
by opposition managers – for the February award, played a huge part in the
side's impressive performances throughout the month. He began April by
scoring the only goal of the game – an unstoppable 25-yard free-kick – as
Terry Westley's men picked up an impressive three away points at Manchester
City. Not satisfied there however, Browne was at it again days later as he
scored all his side's four goals in the thrashing-to-nil victory over
Everton on Merseyside to take his tally for the season to six, a fantastic
total given his campaign has been hampered by injuries. Defeats to Derby
County away from home and Arsenal at London Stadium followed, though the
youngster did pick up an assist against the Gunners as he set-up Domingos
Quina who grabbed a late consolation strike in the 3-1 loss. Browne has been
named on the first team bench on two occasions so far this season, for the
clashes against Swansea City away and Burnley at home.

The five other nominees for the April Player of the Month award are as
follows; Rushian Hepburn-Murphy, Jack Clark (both Aston Villa), Aaron
Connolly (Brighton and Hove Albion), Daniel Barlaser (Newcastle United) and
Sam Smith (Reading).

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Ray: West Ham Ladies will bounce back for season finale
WHUFC.com

West Ham United Ladies General Manager says her team will bounce back from
Sunday's 2-1 loss to Lewes by ending the FA Women's Premier League Southern
Division season on a high. Ray's side had a 13-man unbeaten run prior to
their unfortunate Lewes reverse, but have a final chance for victory in
2017/18 when they host Queens Park Rangers at Rush Green on Sunday 20 May.
Tickets for this match are free for Season Ticket Holders, Claret Members
and all Under-16s, and can be booked here now. Ray felt her team deserved
better against Lewes and has every faith that they will recover to see off
QPR in the season finale. "Sometimes the better team doesn't win, and we
have to learn a hard lesson," she said. "Lewes' goalkeeper was deservedly
player of the match and that says how busy we kept her. "We have to regroup
and focus on the next game. The thing I love most about coaching this team
is that we will undoubtedly dust off and get ready for our next battle. Our
strongest armour is our togetherness. "One loss doesn't define our season,
not many teams have done what we have and I remain extremely proud of this
group of players. It is now my job to pick them up and add some fuel to
their fire."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham: Andy Carroll sent home after row with manager David Moyes
By Simon Stone
BBC Sport

West Ham striker Andy Carroll was sent home from training on Monday
following an argument with manager David Moyes. It is understood Moyes spoke
to Carroll about his conduct after he left the substitutes' bench during
Sunday's 4-1 home defeat by Manchester City. The pair had a heated exchange
before Carroll, 29, was told to go home. After Moyes made a triple
substitution during the second half against City, Carroll went to the
dressing room and did not return before full-time.
Moyes was known to be irritated at Carroll's behaviour, believing the former
England international should have remained to support his team-mates. It is
not known whether there will be any further disciplinary action, although
West Ham's players are not training on Tuesday as they have been given the
day off. The news comes as the Hammers continue to battle for their Premier
League future.
In West Ham's previous home game, Carroll came off the bench to score a late
equaliser against relegation rivals Stoke. But after successive 4-1 defeats
by Arsenal and Manchester City, the Hammers are three points above the
relegation zone with a worse goal difference than third-bottom Southampton.
The uncertainty over the club's position means no decision has been made
about the future of Moyes, or goalkeeper Joe Hart, who is on loan from City
until the end of the season.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
AN UNWRITTEN CODE
AUTHOR: KEVIN SLADE. PUBLISHED: 30 APRIL 2018 AT 5:54PM
TheWestHamWay.co.uk
Written by @KevinSladeSdcc

Manchester City are a football club that we've always had an 'unofficial
bond' with. Their supporters are a carbon copy of our own; they've had the
good times, mainly bad (up until the past decade), but they stuck with the
club through thick and thin. Our mutual respect for each other stems back to
9th May, 1987, in a game where Manchester City had to beat us to avoid
relegation in front of an 18,000 crowd at Upton Park. The final score ended
2-0 to West Ham, which inevitably sent City down into the old Division 2.
Following a pitch invasion from the faithful was something what cemented
this unwritten code between the two sets of supporters for life…

Hundreds of West Ham supporters approached the away end which caused a bit
of a fright to policemen & stewards in the ground, only to witness an
applause to the travelling supporters after their relegation was confirmed.
"Bubbles" was chanted out by the City supporters, scarfs were swapped, and
it was overall an atmosphere of respect between the two. The majority of the
Manchester City fan base who're old enough to remember that day will tell
you that they've always respected us since that moment, which now brings me
to the game yesterday. As I was leaving Stratford station to make the 15
minute walk to the stadium, I overheard many conversations between the two
sets of supporters – mainly how they understand the current situation &
frustrations amongst our fan base since the move to Queen Elizabeth Park, as
it replicated a similar effect to their immigration.

Ray Woods, a Manchester City supporter, sent this in to me earlier today,
explaining what it was like for their supporters prior to their stadium
move:

"I actually signed a petition not to move to the Etihad Stadium (Common
Wealth Stadium as it was known), in the Sherwood Bar, not too far from Maine
Road. I wasn't happy about the move at all, most City fans weren't. In
hindsight, it looks to be a good move, but I think most fans would have
liked to have stayed where we were. It was a proper ground in a proper
community, everyone knew each other and the atmosphere was top. City fans of
that era, and before, fully understand the anger at West Ham, as we had a
chairman called Peter Swales that had driven us into financial turmoil that
would eventually lead us into the third tier of football. Like West Ham's
current board, although he may not have been responsible for all of our
downfall, he was the catalyst for a traumatic few years. We're without a
doubt the luckiest set of supporters in world football now, but we also know
what it's like to be the laughing stock of world football. As I always say,
our success isn't the reason City fans love City. Success doesn't define our
club. Supporting your club lasts a lifetime, & whatever happens in between
is all part of the journey. It's the love for the club that defines a club,
that's why we have so much in common with the Hammers. I hope West Ham &
it's wonderful supporters get to where they need to be, and I sincerely hope
you stay up and gain some success along the way. Maine Road with its
imperfections will always be our home, and the Etihad will never feel like
home. Will I ever be fully happy in it? Probably not! But I'm a football
fan. We're a strange but lovable breed, that's why we will always respect
the Hammers as they're so similar to us. Best of luck! @Kippax73"

@Jxnnymcfc also wrote in to me today as he too feels the frustration on
current affairs after visiting the London Stadium twice in as many seasons:

"West Ham have always been a club that City fans respect. For me, they're a
great club with a fan base that could rival the top clubs in the country.
There's always been a mutual respect there and they don't deserve it."

Although the Blue side of Manchester has had success in abundance since they
moved into their new stadium, let's not forget that it didn't happen
overnight. They left Maine Road in 2003 under a similar basis to ours. After
five years of mediocrity & flirting with relegation, they were eventually
bought out by their current owner for £210m. Albeit Monsour having oil wells
scattered over the globe which boasts his bottomless pit of capitol, the
club also recorded a loss of over £500m not so long ago. Unfortunately,
success in modern day football is only possible with a huge financial
backing, which is vastly becoming the end all & be all for club owners. Our
current situation consists of losing sight to what is happening on the pitch
in my opinion. Whilst i do understand football clubs need to be run like a
business, there is also an obsession with earning as much money as possible
whilst spending as little as possible, which is the problem we are currently
facing and we simply cannot afford to scrape by on the bare minimum in this
league.

It took five years in City's new stadium before they were picked up by a
suitable buyer, who has also gradually introduced their history, original
crest, and respect of their supporters since the takeover…

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Carroll dismissed as row erupts
KUMB.com
Filed: Tuesday, 1st May 2018
By: Staff Writer

Andy Carroll was told to leave the club's training ground after an argument
with David Moyes. The striker, who has spent the vast majority of his time
at West Ham on the bench was spotted leaving the dugout on Sunday
immediately after Moyes made his third and final substitution in the 4-1
drubbing against Manchester City.
And Moyes is understood to have sent Carroll home from training the
following day, on Monday, after the two had what had been described as "a
heated exchange".
Moyes - who in recent weeks has publicly criticised Manuel Lanzini and
teenage defender Declan Rice - is understood to have reprimanded the former
England international for his behaviour. And according to eye-witness
accounts, the 29-year-old was then dismissed from the session after become
embroiled in a very public spat with the temporary manager, whose stock
continues to fall with each passing day. Carroll - who has featured for West
Ham on just 16 occasions this season - is understood to have claimed he
needed to use the toilet as an excuse for his disappearing act during
Sunday's match.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Browne nominated for award
KUMB.com
Filed: Tuesday, 1st May 2018
By: Staff Writer

West Ham youngster Marcus Browne is one of six players nominated for the PL2
Player of the Month award. The 20-year-old midfielder,w ho can play
centrally or as a winger made the shortlist as a result of an impressive
four-goal haul against Everton, which followed a goal against Manchester
City at the beginning of the month. The other nominees are: Daniel Barlaser
(Newcastle United); Jack Clarke (Aston Villa); Aaron Connolly (Brighton &
Hove Albion); Rushian Hepburn-Murphy (Aston Villa) and Sam Smith (Reading).
The only Hammer to win the award previously this season was Declan Rice, who
was named PL2 Player of the Month for October 2017 prior to being promoted
to the first team squad. West Ham ended the season fifth in Division One of
PL2, 11 points behind eventual champions Arsenal, with 31 points from their
22 matches.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Match day programme under threat
KUMB.com
Filed: Tuesday, 1st May 2018
By: Staff Writer

The match day programme is under threat after the Football League decided to
take a vote on whether to continue with the practise. The humble programme
has been a staple of domestic football for more than a century now, with
some rare publications worth many thousands of pounds. Meanwhile lofts
around the country are creaking under the weight of thousands of
carefully-collated collections.
However that may soon be a thing of the past if the 72 member clubs opt to
remove the obligation to provide a programme ahead of every home match -
with the Premier League keeping tabs on the situation. "A number of clubs
have asked the EFL if the mandatory publication of a match programme can be
addressed as a result of an overall decline in sales and the proliferation
of digital and social media," read an EFL statement. However at least one
club have vowed to fight the plans to kill prgramme "We'd always have a
programme because it's a voice from the club to the fans and it's something
some people keep religiously," said Mansfield CEO Carolyn Radford. "It's
part of the fabric of the club and an important piece of memorabilia, a
collector's item. It costs us more to produce than it raises, so I can see
commercially why some clubs would want to get rid and I know we're moving
more online, but it's different having something to hold."

West Ham United currently produce both physical and digital versions of the
match day programme, although the latter is considerably cheaper at £1.99,
compared to the print version's £3.50.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham players lacked pride in Man City defeat, says Dean Ashton
By Liam Grace
Last Updated: 30/04/18 12:31pm
SSN

Dean Ashton has told West Ham players to "show a bit of pride" after losing
4-1 to Manchester City at the London Stadium on Sunday. Pep Guardiola's
side, who clinched the title earlier this month, registered a
record-equalling 30th Premier League win in a game which saw Hammers striker
Andy Carroll leave the substitutes' bench before the end of the match. West
Ham have now gone four games without victory and sit 15th on 35 points -
three points clear of the drop zone with three games remaining - and Ashton
is concerned about his former club's prospects. "There just wasn't that
pride from the West Ham players that I could see to keep City out," he told
Premier League Daily. "Even at 2-0, make sure it stays 2-0. Show a bit of
pride. That was disappointing from my point of view. "For Fernandinho's
goal, there were four City players and two West Ham defenders. When you're
near the bottom of the league that just can't happen."
Ashton also thinks the lack of clarity on David Moyes' future could be
affecting the team's performances. "It is performances like this which could
affect whether he stays or goes," said Ashton. Moyes says he'll deal with
Andy Carroll after the striker headed to the changing room early after not
being brought on against Manchester City "They weren't expected to win but
there is a way you play against City or one of the other top sides, the way
you approach the game. "Either Moyes has done a lot of work during the week
and the players have just ignored it, or they haven't done enough work in
terms of how they set up. "There are a lot of things wrong at West Ham this
season, not just on the pitch."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Andy Carroll sent home from West Ham training after David Moyes bust-up
By Sky Sports News
Last Updated: 01/05/18 8:59am
SSN

West Ham's Andy Carroll was sent home from training yesterday following a
furious bust-up with manager David Moyes, Sky Sports News understands. The
striker was clearly frustrated during Sunday's home defeat to Manchester
City, remaining on the bench as an unused substitute before disappearing
down the tunnel towards the end of the match. In his post-match interview,
Moyes promised to "deal with it", and yesterday the pair were involved in a
heated exchange before Moyes sent Carroll home.
After a 4-1 loss to the champions left the Hammers just three points outside
the drop-zone with three games left, Moyes told Sky Sports: "In this
situation, what you need is everybody to be a team member. So if he has done
that, I'll look at it and I'll deal with it." Carroll, 29, has made 16
appearances for West Ham this season, as he has continued to struggle with
injury problems. He was also sent off against Burnley last October.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
TENSIONS RISING AS WE ENTER THE FINAL WEEK
By Tony Hanna 1 May 2018 at 08:00
WTID

The last nine days of the PL season are fast approaching and to be honest I
can't wait until it is all over. New broom and all that springs to mind.
Three games; away to Leicester, home to the Moaning ones and Everton are the
last course of what has mostly been an unpalatable season. One more win or
two draws should be enough to see us survive but I know a lot of our fans
are expecting the same menu to be dished up next season. Our odds of staying
up barely flinched despite the result on the weekend and this was based on
the fact the bookies expected nothing less than a comprehensive Manchester
City victory and had factored their prices for same. Before the game on the
blog I wrote that I would take a 2-0 defeat right then to protect our goal
difference. Dan Coker backed me up and whilst we both wanted a better
performance from our team we were both being realistic. Whilst saying taking
a 2-0 defeat prior to the event sounds defeatist, it was a hypothetical
viewpoint and it does not mean you accept defeat –it just means as a fan you
hope for the best but fear the worst. It didn't start well with our "guard
of honour." What the hell was that about? I can understand it happening on
the day they are crowned but anything after, especially for a team fighting
relegation, is absurd.

I won't dwell on our game against City. Dave and HH have written their views
in the past couple of days and I have little to add other than the ref
disallowing Arnie's goal was a disgraceful decision and taking goalkeeper
protection rules way too far. I was also disappointed when Evra was picked
ahead of Masuaku and my annoyance only increased when that players
deflection started the rot. Evra has started three times for the Hammers
now, all for 4-1 losses. What is most concerning to me though is there seems
to be an underlying discontent within the playing group. There are several
players who look quite disinterested and I just don't get the vibe – the
group isn't putting in anywhere near the effort our supporters deserve.
Stoke City lack the quality we have and will probably go down, but watch
their games and tell me their players don't care. They are giving it their
all. I can't say that about West Ham at the moment. Apparently, now we have
Andy Carroll walking off down the tunnel before the end of the game because
he was an unused sub. Rumours abound that he was sent home from training on
Monday. I like to see players show emotion but it has to be tempered with
the right team ethos. Moyes has been openly critical of players in recent
weeks and there is little doubt tensions are high behind the scenes. All
this when we really need everyone pulling together. We rarely handle three
games in a week well and it is likely we will use the majority of our fringe
players at some stage next week so we need them all to be correctly focused.

A few weeks ago I was torn between wanting Moyes to stay as manager next
season or not – not that my thoughts carry any weight but hey, we all like
to have an opinion. Last week I wrote that I thought he would be given at
least a year providing we stay up. It is fair to say that he is still
working with the previous managers team, not his own, but if the January
window signings of Evra and Hugill are anything to go by I am rather
sceptical that he is what we need. Moyes joined at a time when many thought
Bilic was taking us down. It is hypothetical as to what would have happened
but apart from the wins against Stoke, Huddersfield and Southampton I have
not enjoyed what I have seen under his tenure. At one point we moved up to
11th and whilst we were not clear of the relegation zone points wise, we did
seem to be comfortably edging away from the drop zone. Since those heady
days it has become quite bland at best. Whoever does manage us next season
will have a task ahead as unless there are some considerable changes I fear
what may be put off this season will come home to roost next season. There
must also be a full scale investigation using independent experts in their
field into why we are having so many injuries at the club. When something
keeps happening season after season, to a greater degree than the majority
of our opponents, there just has to be an underlying reason. Whether it is
buying the wrong players, keeping the wrong players, training grounds,
incorrect warm ups and warm downs, training techniques, how players handle
their physical well being – all these questions must be asked together with
do we have the correct medical team in place? I still recall another West
Ham fan site writing last August that the signing of Gary Lewin could be the
best signing of the season. I shook my head at the time but hoped they were
right. I don't think they were.

Just a recap of what lies ahead next week and the odds for what set of
supporters will be crying on the last day of the season;

West Brom (36 games 28 points) are making a remarkable end of season surge.
Too late for them though and they have Spurs (h) and Palace (a) left to play
and the bookies aren't even pricing them in the markets.

Stoke City (36 games 30 points) are still scrapping but are just so
toothless up front. Their two remaining games are Palace (h) and Swansea
(a), the latter could be a last day cup final of sorts for both teams.
Bookies price is 1/10 for the drop. Put ten quid on to win a quid in other
words.

Southampton (35 games 32 points) are showing good recovery signs. Of all the
teams at the bottom they are the ones I personally want to see go down, but
my guess is they won't. They are left with Everton (a), Swansea (a) and
their only home game remaining is Man City on the final day of the season.
The exchanges have them at 5/4 (44% chance) for the drop which is a bit more
generous than the Corporate bookies who have them even money (50%).

Swansea (35 games 33 points) play Bournemouth (a) and then have critical
home games against Southampton and Stoke to come and likely hold the key to
who goes down. Bookies have them at 5/2 (28%) to be playing Championship
football next season.

Huddersfield (35 games 35 points) have the toughest run in and losing at
home to Everton on the weekend was a huge blow for them as a win would have
almost certainly made them safe. They finish the season with Man City (a),
Chelsea (a) and Arsenal (h) which will be Arsene Wenger's last game in
charge at the Gunners unless they reach the Europa League final which is
scheduled a few days later. Reaching the final or not will have a huge
impact on how seriously Arsenal take this game. Reach the final and Arsenal
will have their minds (and best players) elsewhere – miss the final and they
will be up for the Huddersfield game as Wenger bows out. The bookies have
Huddersfield at 13/8 (38%) to go down.

West Ham (35 games 35 points) have Leicester (a), Moan Utd (h) and bogey
team Everton (h) left to play. The bookies rate us as a 14/1 (6.67%) chance.

Just a side note here. Littlefork has been a poster on here since 2013 and
whilst I don't know the fella he has always been a well mannered and
balanced poster on the site. Yesterday he posted the following; "Life's hard
atm for the littlefork family as eldest grandson is fighting bacterial
meningitis. Out of immediate danger through cranial surgery but a long way
to go. Positive thoughts from the west ham family please". To one of our own
I send best wishes from the WHTID family

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
'It's soulless here': why West Ham fans are in revolt
Football
The Observer
When a football club moves from its historic home to a shiny new stadium, it
leaves more than memories behind – as West Ham supporters are discovering at
the London Stadium
Andrew Anthony
Sun 29 Apr 2018 09.30 BST Last modified on Sun 29 Apr 2018 11.11 BST

It's a mild Monday evening in April and 56,795 people, officially at least,
have come along to London Stadium at the Olympic Park in Stratford to watch
West Ham United play Stoke City in a bottom-of-the-table Premier League
match. That's a large crowd, by any standards, but judging by the fans
milling around the huge concourse outside the ground, it's not a happy one.

Of course, football fans are not renowned for their cheery optimism. By and
large, it's a grim business being a supporter, a forlorn struggle between
daydreams and despair. As Nick Hornby wrote in Fever Pitch: "The natural
state of the football fan is bitter disappointment, no matter what the
score."

In March, during a match against Burnley, some West Ham fans were
sufficiently disappointed to invade the pitch in an act of protest. A much
larger number gathered beneath the directors' box to hurl insults and
objects at the joint chairmen of the club, David Sullivan and David Gold,
who were ushered away by security as the protesters – in a show of magical
thinking of which diehard supporters are reliably capable – demanded that
the board sack itself.

It's highly unlikely that this scene would have taken place had West Ham
been at the top end of the table, yet the animosity was about more than a
poor performance (they went on to lose 3-0 to Burnley).

West Ham are no strangers to setbacks. They've twice been relegated in this
century, and endured several spells in the second tier in the last century.
Such reversals are understood to be part of the twists in fortune that
inevitably attend competitive sport. What has upset the fans this season is
not the loss of a football match so much as the loss of an identity. As far
as the West Ham faithful are concerned, the move in 2016 from the old Boleyn
Ground in Upton Park, three miles to the east, to the London Stadium in
Stratford feels like a painful exile from their spiritual home.

A typical complaint I heard before the Stoke game came from Tom Girling, a
52-year-old who has been following West Ham since he was 13. "This place is
soulless," he said, gesturing at the stadium and the empty expanse in which
it's located. "It's got nothing. I used to go to Upton Park, grab a
programme, nip in the pie and mash, have a bet, into the boozer, meet my
pals, all good, have a laugh, then out afterwards. I've got nish here. I'm
out in the elements drinking beer out of a plastic glass."

I told him that I'd seen a pie and mash kiosk outside nearby Hackney Wick
station, and there is one on the perimeter of the stadium. He looked at me
as if I'd suggested becoming a Spurs fan.

"You mean the fashionista place?" he asked scathingly. "No, no, no. I'm not
being funny… you've got all these trendy bearded people and they've got all
these 13-hop ales I don't understand. I'm old school. I like a pint of
Carling. I'm a working-class boy. Football's a working-class man's game."

As we know, there are few tribes who feel more endangered than the white
working-class male. And while many will mock, the plight of disgruntled West
Ham fans is in many ways a symbol of a culture that is rapidly vanishing
from London life. Among the capital's big football clubs, West Ham long
enjoyed the reputation as being the most grounded in its community – the
working-class East End. It was the home of heroes such as former players
Billy Bonds and the late, legendary Bobby Moore.

But east London is in the midst of a huge transformation, and nowhere is
that process more evident than from the vantage point of the Olympic Park, a
concrete wilderness sitting between the advance forces of gentrification:
consumerism and hipsterism.

On the east side of the park looms the giant glass edifice of the Westfield
shopping centre, a glittering cathedral dedicated to the disposal of excess
income. On the west is an old industrial quarter now inhabited by artists
and canal-side bars with their craft beers and moodily hirsute clientele.
Neither place feels like home to people like Girling, and nor does the
"sterile wasteland" – as another fan, Mark Reynolds, describes it – that
lies between them.

"I don't smell any burgers and onions," Girling complains. Reynolds, a
56-year-old supporter of 43 years' standing, agrees: "You go down to Upton
Park and there's boozers right by the ground. It was all locals and the
market, and you had the Asian community. There was Nathan's, the pie and eel
shop, people used to queue up round the corner. It was just part of the
match-day experience."

But pie and eels don't transform a football team's fortunes, and football,
as we're constantly reminded, is a business. If you're going to be
successful you need to generate enough money to buy the best players. To do
that it helps if you can attract a large attendance. The capacity at Upton
Park, a tight little ground, was 35,000. It's 57,000 at the London Stadium.
As the saying goes, do the maths. Sullivan and Gold did, and they argued
that the new ground was the first step towards a bold, bright future. West
Ham fans understand that logic; they just believe that that future is a
cruel illusion.

"The move to Stratford was made on the promise of a world-class team in a
world-class stadium," says Brian Williams, another long-term fan and author
of Home from Home: A West Ham Supporter's Struggle to Reach the Next Level.
"After two seasons at the new place we know that that's not true, and that
we have given up our history, our heritage, our legacy, all of which was
focused on Upton Park. So we have a very poor team playing at a stadium that
is not fit for football."

History, heritage, legacy? Aren't those rather inflated concepts. After all,
it's only a football pitch surrounded by some seats. What's the big issue?

Back in the summer of 2009 I was taken around a vast building site at
Stratford by members of Sebastian Coe's London Organising Committee for the
2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. At its centre was a giant stadium in the
mid-stages of construction, though its design – a rather bland modern bowl –
was even then clear. It was built to hold 80,000 spectators and then to be
disassembled to leave a capacity of around 25,000. Its legacy, which was the
buzzword of Olympic planning, was to provide an athletics stadium to replace
the decrepit National Sports Centre at Crystal Palace. Coe told me that
there was a "complicated stakeholder landscape" that included the
government, the mayor's office, five London boroughs, UK Sport and Sport
England, but everyone agreed that there should be no "white elephants" left
behind by the Games. He explained that what distinguished the Olympic
Stadium from previous ambitious public projects, like the Dome (now the O2
Centre), was "clarity of purpose".

Shortly afterwards it was decided that the idea of a national athletics
stadium should be shelved. Suddenly the stadium's longterm purpose was
looking distinctly murky. The talk turned to a multi-purpose venue, which in
fact was the concept originally discussed when London was bidding for the
Games. At that time West Ham had expressed an interest in an occupancy, but
were discouraged when a decision was made to design the stadium specifically
for athletics.

Once the Olympics were over, the stadium, having been built as an athletics
arena, became the subject of complex tenancy competition between two
football clubs – West Ham and Tottenham Hotspur – for what seemed like a
cheap way of using a large stadium with great transport links. E20, the
public company set up to run the stadium, offered a deal to the potential
occupants in which taxpayers would pay many of the running costs, like
policing, stewarding and turnstile operators. Tottenham's bid involved
knocking down the Olympic Stadium and building a football-specific arena in
its place, which they estimated would cost a total of £320m.

After much legal wrangling, and accusations of behind-the-scenes deals, it
was West Ham who emerged victorious. And rather than knock down the stadium,
the agreement was made to adapt it for football, at an estimated cost of
£190m. Last year an independent review commissioned by the London mayor,
Sadiq Khan, found that costs had escalated to £323m – more than it would
have cost to build a new stadium.

Inside the London Stadium, the first thing you notice is the low rake of the
terraces and the wide space between the pitch and the stands, where the
athletics track is placed. The space is filled by a green cover which,
according to West Ham's previous manager, Slaven Bilic, left his players
confused about the dimensions of the pitch. There was talk of changing the
colour to claret – West Ham's main kit colour – but that was blocked by the
stadium's owners.

Green or claret, from where I'm sitting in the 35th row watching the Hammers
take on Stoke, that gap makes the action looks oddly remote, as if
disconnected from those watching it. From the 73rd row, at the back of the
stadium, it's more like looking through the wrong end of a telescope. The
atmosphere is a mixture of anxious and surly, with very little singing by
the home team. The exception is a couple of hearty renditions of West Ham's
club anthem, I'm Forever Blowing Bubbles. The lyrics, written by three
Americans in 1918, are filled with a telling pathos.

I'm forever blowing bubbles
Pretty bubbles in the air
They fly so high
Nearly reach the sky
Then like my dreams
They fade and die
Fortune's always hiding
I've looked everywhere
I'm forever blowing bubbles
Pretty bubbles in the air

Who could sing with such conviction about fading and dying dreams but
football fans?

"We can make a din here," Girling had told me, but he felt that it was a
rare occurrence rather than the regular experience at Upton Park, where
opposing teams were "intimidated" by the noise.

Perhaps the only people who have been intimidated at the London Stadium this
season are the owners, Sullivan and Gold. In the club programme for the
Stoke match Sullivan wrote a defensive column, calling on the fans to
"produce the goods in front of the cameras" (the match was live on Sky). The
pair acquired a controlling stake in the club in 2010, buying out the
previous owners – the rump of an Icelandic consortium that was bankrupted by
the 2008 financial crisis. They had previously owned Birmingham City FC,
where they proved to be less than popular. Having made their money in the
porn business, then Ann Summers (Gold) and the Daily Sport (Sullivan), it's
fair to say they have seldom enjoyed a glowing public profile.

But it could be argued that they are well suited to West Ham. They're both
working-class blokes made good. Gold, the son of an East End criminal,
actually grew up a few yards from the Boleyn Ground and even played for the
West Ham youth team.

As the protests showed, however, that counts for little with the fans. There
is a belief that Sullivan and Gold are prone to grand statements on which
they can't or won't deliver. Williams suggests they're "too hands-on in
football matters", in which they are not expert.

This criticism, perhaps unsurprisingly in the still largely unreconstructed
world of football, has been particularly addressed to West Ham's
vice-chairman, and sometime sidekick of Alan Sugar on The Apprentice, Karren
Brady. One fan, who insisted on anonymity, told me: "I think she is probably
the most malevolent influence there is at West Ham."

She did not endear herself to the fans when she tweeted 15 minutes before
the Stoke match that her new TV show was starting at 8pm – the same time as
kick-off. "Give It a Year starts on ITV," she wrote, "hope you watch it and
I hope you enjoy it!"

"She seems more worried about her own ego than what's going on at the
clubs," says Reynolds.

"I'm not her biggest fan," says Williams, with ironic understatement.

Still, when all is said and done, at the time Sullivan and Gold bought the
club it was in financial crisis. Following relegation, they guided it out of
the Championship (the second tier league) and into mid-table Premiership
security, and moved it into a brand-new stadium with good transport links in
a part of London that is set to thrive.

Among the fans I spoke to, Upton Park was a link to a disappeared past for
the East End's white working class
The old Boleyn Ground was not suited to expansion. It has since been
demolished and new Barratt Homes are going up in a development called Upton
Gardens – more East End gentrification. Nor is the area around the ground
quite the pie and mash heaven of old cockney folklore; in fact it's largely
populated by Londoners of subcontinental origin, with Halal butchers and
sari shops. Reynolds says that this was another element of life that made
match days so appealing by contrast with the "soulless" experience of the
new location.

But perhaps it's significant that many of the West Ham fans lament the loss
of community to which they did not in any geographical sense belong.
Williams, for example, lives in Brighton, though his wife hails originally
from the East End, and Girling is a west Londoner with family roots in the
east London meat trade. Reynolds lives in St Albans, "out in the shires", as
he put it. Of half a dozen fans I spoke to at the Stoke game, none lived
near the old ground.

From that admittedly small sample, Upton Park represented a link to a
disappeared past for the East End's white working-class diaspora. Not that
West Ham followers are exclusively white or working class. You do see
different ethnicities, but nowhere like the make-up of either the West Ham
team itself or Newham, the borough that contains Upton Park and some of the
Olympic Park, which – at 16.7% – has the lowest percentage of white British
residents in London.

None of that is to suggest West Ham is unwelcoming of other ethnicities;
it's to note that football, like east London, is in the midst of social
transformation, and as with all change, some will find the new environment
more alienating. "Detached" was how Girling characterised his fellow West
Ham fans' feelings about their new home. But it's possible that to the next
generation of fans, which is likely to come from a more diverse base and for
whom the names of Billy Bonds and Bobby Moore may not possess the same
totemic power, the new setting could well appear more open.

One such candidate might have been 18-year-old Sami Sidhom from Forest Gate,
a West Ham season ticket holder who was at the Stoke game. After the match
he was stabbed to death outside his home in an apparently unprovoked attack,
the latest victim of London's epidemic of teen knife murders.

As they often say in football, such tragic events lend a sense of
perspective. Or as Williams acknowledges in his book, "relocating from one
football stadium to another is not the most serious crisis facing humankind
in these worrying times".

In truth, the London Stadium is not a ground best suited to watching
football or generating an atmosphere of intense – or intimidating –
togetherness. A restless, resentful feeling swirled around the bowl until
Stoke, against the run of play, scored a goal.

Then something more urgent and angry kicked in. The crowd bayed and cursed
and in the last minute, the substitute Andy Carroll hit a superb volley to
equalise. There was a sudden release of pent-up tension and the fans went
home, if not happy, then mollified.

West Ham will probably survive in the Premier League, but the culture and
community with which it has for so long been associated may be destined,
like those pretty bubbles, to fade and die.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

http://vyperz.blogspot.com

Daily WHUFC News - 30th May 2018

Hammers defeated by champions City
WHUFC.com

West Ham United 1 – 4 Manchester City
Premier League

West Ham United suffered a 4-1 defeat to newly-crowned Premier League champions Manchester City at London Stadium on Sunday, conceding a brace of goals either side of the interval as the visitors showed just why they've swept all before them aside this term. The hosts briefly had hope when Aaron Cresswell curled home a 42nd minute free-kick to make the score 2-1, but Gabriel Jesus and Fernandinho scored after the break to add to a Leroy Sane strike and Pablo Zabaleta's own goal in the first half. City were dominant for the large majority of the contest and deserved to take the points, meaning the Hammers head into the final three matches still needing the points to make sure of Premier League safety. The pattern was set early, with the visitors enjoying 80 percent possession in the opening ten minutes, although their opening goal did carry an element of luck to it. Sane's shot from 20 yards appeared to be heading towards Adrian on the right hand side of the goal, but it took a nick off Patrice Evra's head and flew into the opposite corner. West Ham tried to respond and Manuel Lanzini's low cross almost picked out Cresswell in the centre, but Ederson stuck out an arm to push the ball away. Fernandinho fired low and wide of the left hand post with 22 minutes on the clock, and the visitors continued to dominate possession, doubling the lead on 27 minutes with another helping hand from the hosts. This time Kevin de Bruyne got in down the right, taking advantage of some defensive indecision after Adrian initally had to come out of his goal to deny Raheem Sterling, to fire across goal and into the net via unfortunate touches from Declan Rice and Zabaleta. It looked to be a long way back from there for the Hammers, but they gave themselves a lifeline three minutes before the break. In truth, they should have had a penalty when Ilkay Gundogan upended Edimilson Fernandes right in the corner of the penalty area. The Swiss' momentum took him outside of the box and referee Neil Swarbrick only awarded a free-kick, but no matter as up stepped Cresswell to curl inside Ederson's near post. However, the lifeline was only to last until eight minutes after the break, as City restored their two-goal lead. Sterling was too rapid for Cresswell down the right flank, reaching Jesus' searching through ball and waiting for the Brazilian to arrive in the middle before cutting back for him to take a touch and slot home.
Sterling was proving too hot to handle on the right and he almost added a fourth just past the hour when he ran onto Jesus' pass but was denied by Adrian as he came to meet him on the edge of the box. When the fourth did arrive on 64 minutes it was far too easy for the visitors. Manuel Lanzini was caught on the ball inside his half, and quick as a flash Sterling was away again to pick out Fernandinho for a simple finish.

West Ham United: Adrian, Rice, Ogbonna, Evra (Masuaku 66), Zabaleta, Noble (c), Kouyate, Cresswell, Lanzini (Chicharito 66), Fernandes (Joao Mario 66), Arnautovic
Subs: Trott, Cullen, Hugill, Carroll
Goal: Cresswell 42

Manchester City: Ederson, Walker (Danilo 61), Otamendi, Laporte, Delph, Fernandinho (c), Gundogan (Toure 71), Sterling, de Bruyne, Sane, Jesus (Nmecha 79)
Subs: Bravo, Mendy, Foden, B Silva
Goals: Sane 12, Zabaleta og 27, Jesus 53, Fernandinho 64
Booked: Otamendi

Referee: Neil Swarbrick

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Ladies' unbeaten run comes to an end in Lewes defeat
WHUFC.com

West Ham United Ladies' unbeaten run came to an end against Lewes in the FA Women's Premier League on Sunday as they went down 2-1 to their Sussex opponents. The Hammers dominated the first period and took the lead within six minutes when Kelly Wealthall slotted home from close range. And despite Karen Ray's outfit continuing their authority as the second half began and had a succession of chances, however two Lewes goals – courtesy of Katie McIntyre and Amy Taylor – turned the game on its head. It was the perfect start for West Ham when they had the ball in the net and looked on their way to a 14th successive game without a defeat. Ellie Zoepfl was sent in on goal, and when her first attempt cannoned back off goalkeeper Faye Baker, the Players' Player of the Season was able to lift the ball into the box where Wealthall was waiting to tap home. Just after the quarter-of-an-hour mark, there was a golden chance for the No9 to grab a second. Once again sent in on goal by Zoepfl, the forward struck towards goal but Baker, getting something on it, was able to prevent it crossing the line as Lewes scrambled the ball clear. Eight minutes before the break, Zoepfl – who was at the heart of everything the Hammers were doing well – powered down the right-hand-side, but when her cross was slid along the six-yard-line, nobody in Claret and Blue was able to poke in for two. Four minutes into the second period, it looked as if the hosts would go on to grab a second and kill the game, but skipper Rosie Kmita, picked out by Amber Stobbs, saw Baker block her low, goal-bound attempt.
Chances were few and far between, though West Ham saw more of the ball – that was until the 64th minute when the equaliser came. Katie McIntyre, Lewes' captain, received the ball on the left-hand-side 30 yards from goal before shifting it onto her right foot and smashing over Cara Connatser's head from distance to make it 1-1. The Hammers were made to wait for an opportunity to get themselves back in front, but it came ten minutes later. It was again Wealthall, played in by Stobbs, causing the danger, but her left-footed attempt but snuffed out. With 80 minutes on the clock, Zoepfl was gifted a great chance to snatch the lead, but she could only send her free header over the crossbar from Molly Clark's corner kick. And further frustration for West Ham set in with five minutes to go as Lewes bagged what would eventually turn out to be the winner. A mix-up at the back between Connatser and her defenders saw substitute Taylor pounce, as she slotted into an empty net to send the visitors wild. More misery was yet in store for West Ham as Andria Georgiou, booked earlier in the second half for a seemingly nothing challenge, was given her marching orders having received a second yellow card. The Hammers could not conjure up one last chance after that and their unbeaten run came to an end as the referee's full-time whistle sounded.

West Ham United Ladies: Connatser; Mackie, Wheeler, Austin, Auguste; Georgiou, Clark, Stobbs; Zoepfl, Wealthall, Kmita
Subs not used: Chong, Maybe, Sampson
Goals: Wealthall 6

Lewes Ladies: Baker, Thompson, Waine, McCarthy, Wells, Carleton, McIntyre, Owen (Bridges 70), Bergin (Rowbotham 86), Lane, Carter (Taylor 70)
Subs not used: Goldsmid, Newton
Goals: McIntyre 64, Taylor 85

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Moyes: They're the champions, but we needed to be better
WHUFC.com

David Moyes admitted he was disappointed that his West Ham United team were unable to stretch Premier League champions Manchester City to the degree they managed at Eithad Stadium earlier this season, when they fell to a 4-1 defeat on Sunday afternoon. A brace of goals in either half for the visitors, either side of Aaron Cresswell's free-kick, were more than enough for a 30th victory of a dominant Premier League season as Pep Guardiola's men continue to hunt down a number of records. Moyes conceded that at their best City are hard to touch but felt he could have seen more from his side. He also knows that he will need to see them step back up again to secure the three points which would go a long way to securing Premier League football again in 2018/19. "They were very good, as we expected and as they have shown all season, and we weren't very good at all," the manager said. "I hoped we'd have done much better, but I have to say Man City have done this to better teams than us this season. "Manchester City make it very difficult for you, they make the pitch very big and they get players in positions you hope they wouldn't be. They're slick, they're quick and that's why the champions, but we didn't play as well as we could have done. "Things need to go for you a little bit when you play them. Generally we didn't do as well as we did against them at the Etihad earlier this season, we didn't defend as well as we've done against the bigger teams this season, so for those reasons we didn't really get a grip on the game. "We're above the dotted line and we've got games coming up where we've got chances to win. We'll obviously have to play better than we did [today], but I think we've got enough in the bag to win a game. We have to prove that."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Cresswell: We can't afford to dwell on City defeat
WHUFC.com

Aaron Cresswell's first goal in over two years came as little consolation for the Hammers defender as his side went down to a second 4-1 defeat in succession on Sunday. Premier League champions Manchester City proved too strong for the east Londoners at London Stadium, scoring twice either side of the England international's free-kick to leave the Hammers still in search of the points they need to secure Premier League safety. Cresswell's curled effort past Ederson gave the Hammers hope as they headed into the interval, and although the Citizens soon re-established their authority, he says the hosts cannot afford to dwell on Sunday's game as they head into their crucial three remaining fixtures, starting at Leicester next weekend. "We can't dwell on today," the No3 said. "We knew coming into the game that it was going to be tough, but certainly there's never a good time to concede four goals. Our focus now is on Leicester this Saturday.
"We contributed to our own downfall a bit, we conceded two sloppy goals in the first half and then Marko's goal should maybe have been allowed. "We got it back to 2-1, and the mood changes for us, but we concede early on in the second half again and the game's pretty much over. "They're certainly the best side I've ever come up against, but we'll dust ourselves off and get a good week in ahead of Leicester."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
EFFORT AND APPLICATION-THAT IS ALL WE ASK FOR!
AUTHOR: EXWHUEMPLOYEE. PUBLISHED: 29 APRIL 2018 AT 9:57PM
TheWestHamWay.co.uk
Written by Alan Measom

Effort and application. Those 2 things are all we ask for from our team and today we didn't see either of them. I'm just watching match of the day and I'm seeing West Brom, Palace, Stoke, Huddersfield and Southampton all playing for their managers and their own survival.

We don't have rubbish players, despite what Moyes said after the game today about not having the quality. When we played our last season at Upton Park, these players were immense, you can use the spirit of the Boleyn rubbish if you like but they are capable of so much more.

Remember when we were linked with Hodgson and people were scoffing saying we don't want Woy? I'd take him over Moyes any day now, wouldn't you? He has their flair players, playing for him and each other.

Remember when Moyes came in to a fanfare of quotes "if you don't train you won't play" "if you don't run you won't play" I think a lot of us focused on the strong coaching team of Moyes, Irvine, Pearce and McKinley, I really like Stuart Pearce as a player and a man but not as a coach. How can we have had Dicks and Pearce as coaches but yet still can't defend?

The hard man status doesn't wash with me and I couldn't care if we had a quiet, retiring, non masculine manager, I just want us to be committed and try. That's it.

What I can't understand is the contradiction from the board, Moyes is their preferred choice but he has benched our top earner Hernandez and if Moyes stays, Javier goes, how are we going to feel if he goes to Everton, Spurs, Burnley etc and bangs in 20
Goals? The board have invested 15m on Javier and another near 8m in wages. Just doesn't make sense.

So Leicester next, a team fresh off a thrashing at palace with nothing to play for, cue them grinding out at least a point at home against us. COYI

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
#REFWATCH: NEIL SWARBRICK – WEST HAM VS MANCHESTER CITY
AUTHOR: SAMTWHWREF. PUBLISHED: 29 APRIL 2018 AT 5:33PM
TheWestHamWay.co.uk
Written by @SamRoyden

WEST HAM AND NEIL SWARBRICK SHARE THE LIMELIGHT AFTER A CALAMITY OF ERRORS
The London Stadium has become a cauldron of disappointment for West Ham since moving from Upton Park with the board's, so far, incompetence to fulfil the promises. £26 million net has put the club three points above the relegation zone with the worst defence in the league thus far this season. Luckily for the team of refereeing officials who were appointed for this fixture, the limelight of multiple errors that the referee official team endured was overshadowed by the half heartless, lack of effort and pride of the West Ham players conceding four goals, of which two own-goals pushed Manchester City's goals to 102 for the season.

THE STANDARD OF REFEREEING IS DEPLETING IN THE PREMIER LEAGUE
With the current standard of refereeing in the Premier League over the last five years, it's no surprise that FIFA didn't recognise any English FA referees for the World Cup in Russia. I've always said, controversially some would say, that Mark Clattenburg was the best referee to officiate in the Premier League since Howard Webb. Since Clattenburg left to take up a post as Head of Refereeing for the Saudi Arabian Football Federation, only Michael Oliver, Martin Atkinson and Andre Marriner in my opinion have stepped up to the plate.

Neil Swarbrick and his team did not cover themselves in glory at all throughout the game, with some really poor decision making. During the first half, West Ham gave too much respect to Manchester City and to quote Lee Clayton, "I don't mind a guard of honour. City are a team who deserve it. What I don't think I've ever seen is a guard of honour lasting 90 minutes".

Nicolás Otamendi has the tendency to get himself into troubling situations and he was very lucky not to be sent off in the first half after two separate fouls on Manuel Lanzini. The first challenge was a nasty challenge on the West Ham's Argentinian leaving the midfielder in a heap and fully deserved to receive a caution for his troubles. With West Ham showing some fight at the end of the second half, Manuel Lanzini was progressing positively into City's half with an unnecessarily body checking by Nicolás Otamendi preventing a rare West Ham attack. Neil Swarbrick was in the perfect position to see that Otamendi did not make any attempt to win or play the ball. Granted, not every foul is considered to be a cautionable offence but in my opinion, there wasn't any genuine attempt to win Otamendi as Lanzini was going to be quick enough to pass the Manchester City defender.

Marko Arnautović was denied his 11th goal of the season after Swarbrick penalised the Austrian for man handling Ederson before passing the ball into the net. I think Swarbrick did get this one right but Ederson did make a meal of it which ultimately made Swarbrick's decision.

A FIRST HALF TO FORGET FOR THE SWARBRICK AND HIS ASSISTANT REFEREE
The calamities kept coming in the first half for the unfortunate linesman who was patrolling Manchester City's defensive line after failing to spot an offside, which led to missing a clear penalty on Edimilson Fernandes. Obviously if the assistant referee got the offside correct, he wouldn't have needed to be in a position to miss the penalty but as he got it wrong, it's worth clearing them up. I thought that the assistant was in a good position to see across Manchester City's last defender, with Edison in the City goal, and naturally the elite referees are experienced enough especially with Manchester City's defence so high. This clearly wasn't the case as the lapse in judgement sent West Ham on the attack. 30 seconds later, Edimilson Fernandes found himself back to goal inside the area with a Manchester City player clipping his heel, falling outside the penalty area. I appreciate that the game is quick but it's obvious that his planted foot which received the contact was inside or at minimum on the 18 yard line. The 18 yard line is considered to be the penalty area so any foul made on the white line is considered to be inside the area.

There were multiple mistakes on this decision:

The assistant referee was more interested to watch the Manchester City defenders even though his position was 5 yards in front of them to ensure that he could see the line of defence
Neil Swarbrick had taken up a position, running away from goal even though West Ham had possession. I know that position for a referee is important to anticipate the next phase of play, particularly with teams that break fast, but looking over your shoulder at a decision will not give you the best view.
Due to Neil Swarbrick's position, his view was compromised by Manuel Lanzini's position which again, the referee's position should have been better.

THERE WAS NO STOPPING MANCHESTER CITY TO 102 SEASON GOALS
Manchester City ran riot in the second half with two additional goals to add to their tally for the season and the officiating team missed another penalty but this time it was for Manchester City. Raheem Sterling has been in the headlines this season for being overdramatic diving in the penalty area. I can assure you on this occasion that Raheem Sterling deserves to feel aggrieved after Arron Cresswell caught both of the Englishman's ankles when going to ground to challenge for the ball. Again, it's was a ridiculous decision — if Neil Swarbrick thought there was no contact and it was a dive, why did he not caution Sterling? If Neil Swarbrick thought there was contact, why didn't he award the penalty? Why didn't the assistant referee who would have been in align with Cresswell help with the decision? Nevertheless, it's was a poor decision whatever way you look at it and this summed up the game for Neil Swarbrick and his officiating team.

NEIL SWARBRICK'S PERFORMANCE RATING – 4/10

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham Utd 1-4 Manchester City
KUMB.com
Filed: Sunday, 29th April 2018
By: Staff Writer

West Ham conceded three goals or more for the NINTH time since David Moyes succeeded Slaven Bilic as manager, as they fell to yet another demoralising heavy defeat at home. City were made to wait just 13 minutes before taking the lead via a huge deflection off Angelo Ogbonna's back - a lead that was doubled on 27 minutes when Declan Rice inadvertently turned a low centre into his own net.
West Ham showed brief signs of life in the closing stages of the first half and halved the deficit through a well-executed Aaron Cresswell free kick, seconds after Marko Arnautovic was denied what should have been a penalty. However the second half proved to be a walk in the (Olympic) park for the visitors, who added goals from Gabriel Jesus and Fernandinho to secure a not particularly-flattering 4-1 win.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
David Moyes to 'deal with' Andy Carroll's early departure from West Ham bench
By Oliver Yew
Last Updated: 29/04/18 8:53pm
SSN

David Moyes says despite playing an incredible Manchester City side, West Ham were not at their best following their 4-1 defeat. David Moyes will look into the incident that saw Andy Carroll leave the substitutes' bench before the end of the game during West Ham's 4-1 defeat to Manchester City. Moyes made a triple substitution in the 65th minute when the Hammers were already 4-1 down, bringing on Javier Hernandez, Joao Mario and Arthur Masuaku, leaving Carroll as an unused substitute. The frustrated striker then left the bench to go inside and Moyes says he will deal with the situation. "It's something I'll deal with," the West Ham boss told Sky Sports. "In this situation what you need is everybody to be a team member so if he has done that, I'll look at it and I'll deal with it." Moyes saw his side comprehensively beaten at the London Stadium as City racked up a century of Premier League goals to ensure West Ham remained in the relegation fight.
Leroy Sane, Gabriel Jesus and Fernandinho were on target, while Pablo Zabaleta scored an own goal against his old club, as Pep Guardiola's side cruised to a record-equalling 30th victory of the campaign, and Moyes was full of praise for the title winners. They were very good," he said. "It's what we expected and they've shown it all season. "However, we weren't very good at all. I hope we'd have done much better but I have to say Manchester City have done this to better teams than us this season. "They make the pitch very big, they've got players in positions you'd hope you wouldn't be and they're slick, they're quick and that's why they're champions. "Things need to go for you in these games. I didn't think we did as well as we did against them at the Etihad earlier in the season. "I didn't think we defended as well as we'd done against the bigger teams this season."
The defeat leaves the Hammers just three points above the relegation zone with three games to play, but Moyes thinks his side still has enough quality to beat the drop. "When we came in we were below it, we're now above it and I think we've got games coming up where we've got chances to win," he said. "We'll obviously have to play better than we're doing just now but I think we've got enough in the bag to win a game but we have to prove it."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Alan Shearer slams 'lazy' West Ham performance at home to Manchester City: 'I don't think it was anywhere near good enough'
Alan Shearer criticised the performance by the West Ham players on Sunday
The Hammers were beaten 4-1 by Premier League champions Manchester City
West Ham are just three points above relegation zone with three games to go
By Kate Mcgreavy For Mailonline
PUBLISHED: 00:20, 30 April 2018 | UPDATED: 00:28, 30 April 2018

Alan Shearer has slammed West Ham's performance in their 4-1 home defeat by Manchester City on Sunday. David Moyes' side found themselves behind within the opening 13 minutes when Leroy Sane's deflected effort beat goalkeeper Adrian. An own-goal by Pablo Zabaleta doubled City's lead and although Aaron Cresswell pulled a goal back for the Hammers before half-time, goals from Gabriel Jesus and Fernandinho secured a comfortable victory for the Premier League champions.BBC Match of the Day pundit Shearer criticised the performance by the West Ham players on the programme on Sunday night. 'I thought they robbed their fans today, I really did,' he said. 'Yes Manchester City are an excellent side. You've got to try and make teams earn their points and I don't think West Ham did that today at all. 'I think they were lazy, I think there was a complete lack of effort other than five minutes towards the end of the first half did they put up a bit of a fight. 'I think they turned up expecting to be beaten and be beaten badly. 'I don't think that performance was anywhere near good enough.'
Following Sunday's defeat, West Ham are just three points above the relegation zone with three games remaining.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Moyes press conference: every word as West Ham boss blames Lanzini & being thumped by Man City
Here is what the manager had to say after the 4-1 trouncing at the hands of the champions
Football London
By Sam Inkersole
West Ham Correspondent

You gave them something to think about at half time but their quality showed in the end
Not much to think about. They were far better than us, outstandingly good. We didn't do well enough from the start but we found a way of getting back into it just before half time. But overall, I can't have any complaints on the way they [City] played. They were excellent. We didn't defend as well as we have done against the other big teams this season, we just didn't do as well filling in the box, stopping things as maybe what we had done in other games.

Triple substitutions are pretty rare, was that out of necessity or a message?

I was unfortunate I didn't get it done before the fourth goal went in. At the time, I just think we needed to freshen up, we were struggling. Even if we put on five subs I don't know it would have made that much difference they were so good at keeping the ball. So we couldn't get close enough to them throughout the game and I think more importantly it was to say look, we'll make the changes and see if we can keep at it and not concede any more goals.

Booed for taking Manuel Lanzini off, reaction?

Yeah totally accept it. But everybody should look at the fourth goal, and then they'll maybe see why. The players here have got to understand, we play players to keep the ball, to defend. Manu had a great chance to keep the ball for us and we end up losing the fourth goal for it. But hey, no problem – it happens.

Had you made the decision before that goal?

Yes I had. You must be a little anxious about the teams behind you? I'm not as anxious as when I came in, because we were in the bottom three then. So the big job is to stay out the bottom three, we've got three games to go. In the main our form at the stadium here has been pretty good, up until today we'd won three, drawn three and lost one. I'm hoping that one of those games we can take points and we go to Leicester next week, so if we can turn one of those into a win then we'll be okay.

The fans seemed to accept the result, City too good?

Yeah I think everybody is in full appreciation of what Man City can do to you. I want to challenge them and I wanted to do better than I done today, so I'm disappointed overall with it, we didn't do better and the next time I play them I'll try and do something different to beat them but it's difficult.

Suggestions the decision has been made not to sign Hart?

That's false information because nothing will be decided until safety is secured. That's incorrect information.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

http://vyperz.blogspot.com