Saturday, May 19

Web Digest [ West Ham United ] - II 18th May 2007

Right folks , I'm getting married today , so Dave Witts will be doing the
digest duty for the next 5 days.

PeterR

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Galey's View - WHUFC

Well, I'd like to say I told you so but I got it completely wrong. What I
did get right is that I thought we'd stay up and we did. No one could have
imagined Wigan winning at Sheffield United and us nicking a win at Old
Trafford. Admittedly, United were not as committed as usual but, bearing in
mind they had a Cup final a week later, it was understandable that some of
their star players didn't want to get injured. You still have to capitalise
on that - and we did, which is all credit to the lads' attitude and Curbs
and the staff seeing it out to the bitter end. What I don't like is all the
moaning and sniping that's going on about the Tevez situation. What it has
done is take the gloss off a magnificent run of winning seven games out of
the last nine. It really has been a Steve McQueen job - a real great escape!

Hopefully now in the summer a lot of the bleating will stop. There's been a
lot of talk of court cases and all sorts but the fact is we stayed up on
merit and the others can't live with it. Now they're looking for a way out
through the law courts. To my mind, the Premier League asked for an
independent tribunal which the Clubs also voted for. They got their result
and now they don't like it. Unfortunately for them they've got to live with
it and I can't see the decision being reversed. I'm sure it's going to be a
busy summer in the transfer market for Curbs and Eggert and we're all
looking forward to seeing some new quality signings. I'm sure Alan knows who
he wants in and who he wants out. I bet he, like the rest of us, can't wait
for the new season and a fresh start.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Mixed night for Hammer Hogan - WHUFC
18/05/2007 13:42

It was a night of mixed emotions for Hammers youngster Hogan Ephraim as he
scored and was subsequently sent off as England's Under 19s crashed out of
UEFA European Championship qualifiers. Last night's 2-1 defeat to Holland
at the Ricoh Arena saw Scott Goldbourne score an own goal and Jordy Bujis
put the ball in from the penalty spot before Hogan pulled a goal back for
England in the 90th minute with a curling effort. Sadly for the Hammers
youngster he was red-carded seconds later for a late lunge on Bujis as
England failed to qualify for the European Championships.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tevez: Time for a change - Sky
By Patricio Figueroa - Created on 18 May 2007

Carlos Tevez has revealed 'it's the time to join a European giant', but
admits West Ham United still have the priority over his future. The
Argentine's stunning form in the closing weeks of the season kept The
Hammers in the Premiership, following his controversial transfer to Upton
Park. Relegated Sheffield United are leading a legal challenge after West
Ham were not docked points due to the ineligibility of Tevez, and his
compatriot Javier Mascherano. Tevez is aiming to shake off the fuss
surrounding his move from Corinthians, organised by MSI owner Kia
Joorabchian. But while the forward is indebted to The Hammers, he feels it
is time to transfer his undoubted talents to a leading European club. "First
of all, I must say that I don't know anything about Real Madrid, but if
there are rumours it must be because there is something true in all that,"
said Tevez at a press conference in Buenos Aires. "The Spanish and the
Italian leagues haven't finished yet, and even in England the giant teams
are playing a final, so I don't think they will be thinking at this moment
of making an offer for any player. "Despite any offer that could arrive,
what I want to say is that West Ham has the priority. "Now I think it's the
time to change to a new team, a European giant. "I have already spoken about
that with my agent and with Kia, but I repeat that the priority belongs to
West Ham because they have been incredible with me. "They have treated me
and Mascherano in a great way since the first day we arrived in England.
"Kia is my friend, he is also a friend of my family and the owner of my
transfer, and we always decide together everything that I do in my career."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Eggert angered by comments - Sky
By Chris Stanton - Created on 18 May 2007

West Ham chairman Eggert Magnusson has accused Sheffield United of dragging
his club's reputation through the mud over the Carlos Tevez affair. United,
in league with former relegation rivals Wigan, have vehemently protested
over the Premier League's decision to only fine The Hammers, rather than
dock the East Londoners points.
The Blades' appeal is all the more bitter given the club's relegation last
week, but Magnusson insists his club have no case to answer, even if he does
sympathise with United's plight. "I have not called anyone at Sheffield.
It's difficult. But I feel for them. It's difficult to go down," Magnusson
told the Daily Telegraph. "But I feel that some things that have been said
about this great club are unjustified. "From my point of view both Tevez and
(Javier) Mascherano were registered correctly on 31st August and the
registration of Tevez has been correct from that date until the end of the
season. "There should be no dispute. There have been all sorts of
misinterpretations on this but everyone agrees on this, including Fifa and
the Premier League."
Magnusson insists he hold no grudges against Tevez's owner, Kia Joorabchian,
who helped orchestrate the original deal back in August. "There hasn't been
too much of a relationship between Kia and myself. But I cannot hold him
responsible for what happened here. He probably didn't know anything about
the fact that these third-party agreements were not disclosed to the Premier
League," added Magnusson. "When I took over the club, I had no idea until
January that these agreements had not been disclosed to the Premier League.
I had no way of knowing that, how would I? I am sure he didn't know anything
about that. I have no bitterness towards him, why should I? "Sometime in the
near future I hope to have a meeting with him. We will sit down and discuss
Tevez's future."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tev eyeing move to European giant - teamTalk

West Ham and Argentina striker Carlos Tevez has revealed he wants to play
for a "European giant" next season. The Hammers star was instrumental in his
club's successful fight against Premiership relegation, but is now after a
move to a bigger team. Asked about reported interest from Real Madrid,
Liverpool and Manchester United, he said: "I'm delighted several teams are
looking at me. Nobody has talked to me, but I assume that it must be true.
"I want a transfer to a European giant, even though West Ham has been my
priority as since I arrived there they have treated me very well. The people
there are affectionate. "The culture is very different. I like it as it is
peaceful. For the past four years I couldn't go out to walk on the streets.
"They fans love me because of my personality and because I give everything
on the field. It is unbelievable that they scream 'Argentina'." Tevez also
admits he is desperate to play in the Copa America this summer and in all
the national team's friendly matches. "I talked with (Argentina coach Alfio)
Basile and I told him that I'm in good shape and that I don't need to go on
holiday," he continued. "I want to be involved in Argentina's friendlies
matches and in the Copa America. For the Albiceleste I would even play as a
goalkeeper."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Should I stay or should I go? - KUMB
Filed: Saturday, 19th May 2007
By: Matthew O'Greel

Carlos Tevez has announced that he would be delighted to play for West Ham
United next season. The 23-year-old striker, speaking in a hastily arranged
press conference in Puerto Madero yesterday lunchtime revealed that the
prospect of a second season at the Boleyn Ground wasn't beyond the realms of
possibility. However Tevez - who returned to Argentina on Tuesday morning
following his final appearance for United at Old Trafford - also sent out a
clear message to Europe's major powers that he would be open to any tempting
offers. "My priority is West Ham because since I arrived they have treated
me very well and with much affection," he said. "But it excites me that
several teams are considering me. I want to play for a great European team.
"They have not communicated with me, but I suppose that [the rumours] must
be true."
So we're none the wiser, perhaps. However it is clear that Tevez feels
genuine affection for the Hammers, as he later revealed in the press
conference when asked about his year in London. "They warmed to me because
of how I am, and because I leave my heart on the field," he added. "It was
hard to adapt at first; English football is more physical than technical.
The culture is very different, very high level. "But I like the
tranquility. Four years ago I couldn't even go out for a walk."
Tevez ended the press conference by wishing his friend and mentor Diego
Maradona, who has been suffering from illness, a speedy recovery. "I feel
very badly whenever something happens to him," he said. "All we want is for
him to be well - and I hope that he recovers".

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Never Ether - KUMB
Filed: Friday, 18th May 2007
By: Matthew O'Greel

West Ham have rejected a £3m bid from Wigan for Matthew Etherington,
according to the Independent. The bid - received earlier today - was
instantly dismissed by the Hammers, who are less than willing to do business
with the Latics given the recent comments and threats of litigation made by
Chairman Dave Whelan. Winger Etherington is one of a number of players
destined for the chop this summer as Alan Curbishley prepares to shuffle the
pack in preparation for the 2007/08 season. Others likely to be moving
elsewhere include John Paintsil, Tye Mears, Carlton Cole and Marlon
Harewood, who is interesting a number of Premier League and Championship
clubs. 41-year-old Teddy Sheringham has already been released.

* The Indy also claim that Yossi Benayoun has agreed to extend his time at
West Ham by signing a bumper new deal. Benayoun's existing contract has two
years left to run, and he rejected a new deal earlier this year after Kia
Joorabchian's bid to buy the Hammers ended in failure. But the Israeli
international captain is thought to have had a change of heart since the
Hammers avoided relegation last weekend.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Harry's guide to 4 ex-Hammers - The Sun

By ANDREW DILLON
MAY 19, 2007

RIO FERDINAND proved he was up for the cup at just 15 — when he tore Chelsea
to shreds in his first big match. Ferdinand faces the Blues again as one of
four players in today's FA Cup final to have been groomed by Harry Redknapp
at West Ham. The England defender links up with Manchester United team-mate
Michael Carrick against former Hammers pals Joe Cole and Frank Lampard.
SunSport columnist Redknapp recalled: "Rio had only just signed up to us
when the boys got to the final of the Southern Junior Floodlit Cup. It was a
prestigious tournament in those days, second only to the FA Youth Cup. "West
Ham lost 4-2 at Upton Park in the first leg and to everyone at the club it
seemed the tie was over — it was Chelsea's for the taking. "On the night of
the second leg at Stamford Bridge, the first team were away so I could not
attend. "But Tony Carr, West Ham's astute youth team manager, decided to
throw Rio into the game to see how he got on. "He had to get him out of
school that day to play and I didn't ask how he did it! "That evening, I
got a call from my dad, Harry. "He loved watching the lads and he had gone
to Chelsea to watch the game. He called me that night absolutely gushing
down the phone. "West Ham had won 5-1 and took the trophy, destroying the
Chelsea team on their own pitch. "And he told me he had just watched the
best player he had ever seen. He was so excited. "He told me the lad's name
was Rio Ferdinand. I had seen him play a bit but didn't know too much about
him. We did from then on." Ferdinand eventually took command of the West Ham
defence before arriving at Manchester United via Leeds. Portsmouth boss
Redknapp added: "Even at 16 years old, I would describe him as a Rolls-Royce
of a player. Pacy and elegant. "I could see he was going to be a star, the
best defender in Europe — which he achieved. "What a shame they aren't all
still playing for West Ham. To have a nucleus of a team like that and to see
it all disappear must be so disappointing for West Ham supporters. "All four
are good, proper, working-class lads. "In a game which seems to have left
its roots behind, they still represent where football came from. "They fully
appreciate the FA Cup's significance."

FERDINAND'S WEST HAM CAREER: Born: Nov 7, 1978. Signed: 1995. Left: 2000.
Apps: 127. Goals: 2.

FRANK LAMPARD

REDKNAPP: "The most determined young player. No one worked harder or was
more committed than Frank to making it as a professional. His attitude was
superb, even as a youngster. "I've watched him grow up and, as my nephew, I
would be lying if I said I wasn't bothered who wins the cup final. I'll be
rooting for Frank."

LAMPARD'S WEST HAM CAREER — Born: Jun 21, 1978. Signed: 1994. Left: 2001.
Apps: 148. Goals: 24.

JOE COLE

REDKNAPP: "The most naturally-talented kid I ever saw. As an 11-year-old,
you could ask him to do anything. A genius. He really had it all by the time
he was in secondary school. "Joe's feet are still firmly on the ground
despite his success. "But I bet you would get a lot more now than the
£6.6million Chelsea paid for him in 2003."

COLE'S WEST HAM CAREER — Born: Nov 8, 1981. Signed: 1998. Left: 2003. Apps:
126. Goals: 10.

MICHAEL CARRICK

REDKNAPP: "A late developer. Then he seemed to shoot up from 5ft 6in to 6ft
1in in a week! "But his body couldn't support him. He was all gangly arms
and legs. His brain was that of a seasoned pro but his legs couldn't keep
up. "He has caught up in all the right departments now and I love watching
him alongside Paul Scholes."

CARRICK'S WEST HAM CAREER — Born: Jul 28, 1981. Signed: 1998. Left: 2004.
Apps: 136. Goals: 6

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tevez: I'm off to Europe - the Sun
By ERIC BEAUCHAMP
May 19, 2007

CARLOS TEVEZ revealed he will break West Ham hearts by joining one of
Europe's big guns. Real Madrid and Inter Milan are gearing up for a
£30million battle to land the Argie forward after his heroics helped Hammers
escape relegation. Tevez, 23, confirmed he has set his sights on a move to
Spain or Italy as he waits for his future to be resolved. He said: "I really
want to join one of Europe's biggest clubs. That's what I've talked to my
representatives about. "I don't know about the interest from Real but it
makes me happy that such an important club is interested in me. "We don't
currently have any offers because the Spanish season is still on and the big
English sides are in the FA Cup final and the Champions League final.
"People at West Ham were incredible and I'll never forget that. But I want
to play for one of Europe's greats."
Tevez could not believe the reception he received at Old Trafford last week
after his goal beat Manchester United and kept West Ham up. He explained: "I
had an uncle who was in the Falkland Islands. I know how the war left him.
"For the English fans to shout 'Argentina, Argentina' for me as they did at
Old Trafford is unexplainable. "That they love me and see me as an idol is
fantastic."

e.beauchamp@the-sun.co.uk

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Hammers reject Wigan's £3m bid for Etherington - The Independent
By Jason Burt and Andy Hunter
Published: 19 May 2007

Wigan Athletic have made a bid of about £3m to sign Matthew Etherington from
West Ham United. Unsurprisingly, given the bad feeling between the two clubs
over the Carlos Tevez affair, the offer, and its timing, is thought to have
been met with some incredulity at Upton Park and been rejected out of hand.

Nevertheless, the likelihood is that the unsettled 25-year-old winger, who
almost joined Fulham in the January transfer window, will leave, although
West Ham are believed to be demanding a far higher transfer fee than has
been currently lodged by Wigan.

Wigan chairman Dave Whelan has led the so-called "gang of four" clubs who
are protesting at the Premier League's decision to allow Tevez to continue
playing for West Ham even though at an inquiry they admitted breaking rules
on third-party ownership.

Having narrowly avoided relegation, Wigan are themselves wasting no time in
re-building their squad and are hopeful that they will sign Lee Carsley from
Everton. The 33-year-old midfielder is out of contract this summer and
although he will be offered a new deal at Goodison Park, it is unlikely that
the terms will match what has been tabled by Wigan.

At the same time, West Ham have identified Scott Parker as their first
serious transfer target. Sources at Newcastle United claim that the
26-year-old's future at the club is in the balance following the arrival of
new manager Sam Allardyce. This has not gone unnoticed by West Ham manager
Alan Curbishley who is keen to build his midfield around a player he groomed
at Charlton Athletic before he moved to Chelsea for £10m.

Newcastle are likely to demand at least £7m for Parker who, although
captain, has endured a difficult time at St James' Park through injury and
the under-achievements of the team. If he moved back to London it would
raise further question marks over the future of West Ham's Nigel Reo-Coker
although sources insist no decision as yet been taken as to whether he will
leave.

One player who is not now departing West Ham is Yossi Benayoun who had
demanded a transfer after appearing to fall out with Curbishley. However the
Israel international spoke to the manager on Wednesday and held a meeting
with the club on Thursday when he received assurances that he will be a
first-team regular next season. Benayoun, who has two years left on his
present deal, is also likely to receive a new improved contract which will
see his wages rise from £25,000 to around £40,000 a week.

West Ham want to sort out the futures of players such as Anton Ferdinand,
Paul Konchesky and Marlon Harewood before they start spending. They will
monitor developments over Mark Viduka, out of contract at Middlesbrough, and
Charlton's Darren Bent - two strikers they attempted to sign in January and
who appear certain to leave their clubs.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Benayoun U-turn: New West Ham deal on table
tribalfooball.com - May 18, 2007

Yossi Benayoun is staying with West Ham United. The Independent says the
Israel international spoke to manager Alan Curbishley on Wednesday and held
a meeting with West Ham officials on Thursday where he received assurances
that he will be a first-team regular next season. Benayoun, who has two
years left on his present deal, is also likely to receive a new improved
contract which will see his wages rise from £25,000 to around £40,000 a
week.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham to offer £7M for Newcastle's Parker
tribalfooball.com - May 18, 2007

West Ham United are stepping up their plans to land Newcastle United captain
Scott Parker. The Independent says sources at Newcastle United claim that
the 26-year-old's future at the club is in the balance following the arrival
of new manager Sam Allardyce. This has not gone unnoticed by West Ham
manager Alan Curbishley who is keen to build his midfield around a player he
groomed at Charlton Athletic before he moved to Chelsea for £10m. Newcastle
are likely to demand at least £7m for Parker who, although captain, has
endured a difficult time at St James' Park through injury and the
under-achievements of the team.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham reject Wigan offer for Etherington
tribalfooball.com - May 18, 2007

Wigan Athletic have had a £3 million bid for West Ham winger Matthew
Etherington turned down.
Unsurprisingly, given the bad feeling between the two clubs over the Carlos
Tevez affair, the offer, and its timing, is thought to have been met with
some incredulity at Upton Park and been rejected out of hand.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Hammers 'hoping to bag Bellamy' - teamTalk

West Ham are resigned to losing Carlos Tevez to a top Spanish club in the
summer - and could replace him with Liverpool's Craig Bellamy. Tevez's
end-of-season form was a crucial factor in the Hammers' great escape from
the Premiership relegation trap door. But the 23-year-old Argentina ace's
days at Upton Park look numbered, with a switch to the Primera Liga widely
expected in the coming weeks. Real Madrid are leading the chase for Tevez's
services, and attention in the East End has already turned to his successor
in Alan Curbishley's forward line. And chairman Eggert Magnusson has
reportedly earmarked Bellamy as the man to maintain the Hammers' attacking
zest. The Reds could be tempted to part with the Wales international, 27,
especially as Magnusson is prepared to hand Rafael Benitez a £2million
profit on top of the £6million he paid to Blackburn last summer.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tevez wants to remain a Hammer - viewlondon.co.uk
West Ham hero Carlos Tevez has pledged his future to the Hammers.

The Argentina striker helped his side stay in the Premiership last weekend
with the winning goal against champions Manchester United at Old Trafford.
Reports have claimed the 23-year-old will move to Real Madrid or Inter Milan
for £30 million in the summer as he is still owned by Media Sports
Investment (MSI). But while Tevez admitted he would like to sign for a
European giant, his first choice is to stay at the Hammers. "The West Ham
supporters were incredible to me, I will never forget it, and so West Ham
will always have priority," Tevez said. "But, if they are going to sell me,
yes, I would like to play for a big European club."
Tevez is still at the centre of a bitter row with four Premiership clubs
after the Hammers escaped a points deduction after breaking Premier League
rules in signing the Argentine international. Sheffield United, Fulham,
Charlton, and Wigan are furious West Ham were only fined with the Blades
threatening legal action following their relegation to the Championship.
Tevez is currently on a holiday in Bueno Aires and hopes to play in
Argentina's Copa America campaign which begins on June 26th, a
tournament which they finished runners-up to arch rivals Brazil in 2004.
© Adfero Ltd

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tevez: "Hammers are my priority"Print - EuroSport

Argentina forward Carlos Tevez has said his priority is to stay with West
Ham United, even though he also dreams of playing for a big European club.
"The West Ham supporters were incredible to me, I will never forget it," he
said. "West Ham will always have priority; but, if they are going to sell
me, I would like to play for a big European club." West Ham, who had a poor
season until the run-in when they won seven of their last nine games,
escaped the drop after a Tevez goal gave them a dramatic final-day 1-0 win
away to champions Manchester United. But the signing of Tevez and compatriot
Javier Mascherano, who moved to Liverpool in January, also created
controversy. West Ham were fined a record £5.5 million last month by an
independent Premier League commission which ruled that the players'
contracts drawn up at their August transfer contravened league rules by
giving certain rights to third-party companies.
West Ham admitted the charge and escaped a points-deduction that would have
almost certainly condemned them to relegation. Wigan Athletic, who survived
the drop, and Sheffield United, who went down, are at the head of a group of
clubs threatening to challenge the Premier League in the courts over its
decision not to dock West Ham points. FIFA president Sepp Blatter said that
football's governing body would investigate the case. Meanwhile, Tevez says
he is hoping to be picked by Argentina coach Alfio Basile for the Copa
America from June 26th to July 15th.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham is the priority for Tevez - The Guardian

BUENOS AIRES, May 18 (Reuters) - Argentina forward Carlos Tevez said on
Friday his priority was to stay with West Ham United although he also
dreamed of playing for a big European club. "The West Ham supporters were
incredible to me, I will never forget it, and so West Ham will always have
priority," said Tevez, a key figure as the London club escaped relegation
from the Premier League last weekend. "But, if they are going to sell me,
yes, I would like to play for a big European club," he told reporters. West
Ham, who had a poor season until the run-in when they won seven of their
last nine games, escaped the drop after a Tevez goal gave them a dramatic
final day 1-0 win away to champions Manchester United. But the signing of
Tevez and compatriot Javier Mascherano, who moved to Liverpool in January,
also created controversy. West Ham were fined a record 5.5 million pounds
($10.88 million) last month by an independent Premier League commission
which ruled that the players' contracts drawn up at their August transfer
contravened league rules by giving certain rights to third-party companies.
West Ham admitted the charge and escaped a points deduction that would have
almost certainly condemned them to relegation. Wigan Athletic, who survived
the drop, and Sheffield United, who went down, are at the head of a group of
clubs threatening to challenge the Premier League in the courts over its
decision not to dock West Ham points. FIFA president Sepp Blatter said that
soccer's governing body would investigate the case. Meanwhile, Tevez says he
is hoping to be picked by Argentina coach Alfio Basile for the Copa America
from June 26 to July 15

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham chairman blasts Sheffield Utd
tribalfooball.com - May 18, 2007

West Ham chairman Eggert Magnusson has accused Sheffield United of dragging
his club's reputation through the mud over the Carlos Tevez affair.
United, in league with former relegation rivals Wigan, have vehemently
protested over the Premier League's decision to only fine The Hammers,
rather than dock the East Londoners points. The Blades' appeal is all the
more bitter given the club's relegation last week, but Magnusson insists his
club have no case to answer, even if he does sympathise with United's
plight. "I have not called anyone at Sheffield. It's difficult. But I feel
for them. It's difficult to go down," Magnusson told the Daily Telegraph.
"But I feel that some things that have been said about this great club are
unjustified. "From my point of view both Tevez and (Javier) Mascherano were
registered correctly on 31st August and the registration of Tevez has been
correct from that date until the end of the season.
"There should be no dispute. There have been all sorts of misinterpretations
on this but everyone agrees on this, including Fifa and the Premier League."


::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Addicks eyes Teddy swoop Fri, May 18 2007 17:20 - EatSleepSport

Charlton boss Alan Pardew wants veteran striker Teddy Sheringham to plot The
Addicks return to the Premiership. Pardew expects to lose Darren Bent this
summer as a whole host of clubs show an interest in him and the Addicks boss
wants the West Ham United man to replace him. Pardew made a move for
Sheringham in January but the deal was rejected by his West Ham counterpart
Alan Curbishley, who did not want the veteran to help one of the Hammers'
rivals in their battle to beat the drop. Charlton are now set to make
another move for Sheringham who is out of contract this summer and wants to
carry on playing. Sheringham feels that he has still got another season at
least left in his legs and could end his career at The Valley just a few
miles from where he
started out at Millwall. The Lions themselves are also keen but Sheringham
would prefer to play in the Championship.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Portsmouth move for West Ham's Benayoun
tribalfooball.com - May 18, 2007

Portsmouth are moving for West Ham United midfielder Yossi Benayoun. The
Mirror says Portsmouth boss Harry Redknapp wants Benayoun with agent Pini
Zahavi ready to broker a deal as he is close to both the player and manager.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Villa join race for West Ham's Reo-Coker
tribalfooball.com - May 18, 2007

Aston Villa have joined the race for West Ham United midfielder Nigel
Reo-Coker. Tottenham have been long-term admirers of the England U21
international, while Villa and Everton are also keen, says the Mirror.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Change in rhetoric reveals McCabe's true agenda - all3points.com
18th May 2007
By Darren Morgan

As soon as Dave Whelan launched his ill-conceived crusade for justice in the
wake of West Ham's fining for their role in 'Tevezgate', several white
knights across the country saddled up to ride forth with their new leader.
In the county of South Yorkshire, Kevin McCabe hastily donned his chainmail
and stitched a red cross onto his surcoat before heading south to borrow
Jonathan Aitken's 'sword of truth'.

Several days later, and a marked change in tone from McCabe tellingly
reveals his campaign for truth, justice and the English way, to be exactly
what it is – a last, desperate, squalid attempt to boost the Bramall Lane
coffers. Over the last few days, McCabe has been very vocal on the injustice
that has seen his club relegated: "If by right and there is any justice in
this land, we will be in the Premiership next season", "The board of the
Premier League need to properly address this and right the wrong, the
injustice, that Sheffield United have got.", "I think most of the Premier
League clubs and other football clubs support us over this injustice that
has come about this season.". All wonderful soundbites from McCabe, that
point to a great and unfair aberration in the law.

When taken in conjunction with the bile belching its way out of the JJB
Stadium, that West Ham should be deducted points, the implication is clear -
West Ham should be relegated, not Sheffield United. Yesterday however,
McCabe seemed to veer slightly from this well planned path. Instead of
demanding West Ham be deducted points and relegated as a result, he is now
advocating a 21 team league, "It is up to the FA Premier League to find a
way round this exceptional circumstance where a club which has played by the
rules has been relegated at the expense of one club who have fielded
ineligible players.
"The simple answer is why not have 21 clubs in the Premiership next season
and relegate four of them at the end. It is not my decision to make but it
seems like a very simple solution."

Apart from continuing in his incorrect assertion that Carlos Tevez was
ineligible, what could possibly have caused McCabe to change tack?
Admittedly, the recent letter from the Premier League to the 20 member clubs
explains in clear and explicit detail that Tevez has never been ineligible
at any time this season. It also clearly explains that West Ham disclosed
the Argentine's third party ownership at the time of registration. Instead,
the reader of the letter is left in no doubt that West Ham were guilty of
nothing more than a clerical error regarding the right of the third party to
sell Tevez in January without West Ham's agreement, and then lying to try
and cover up their bumbling incompetence.

Given the vague nature of the Premier League's rules on third party
ownership, there could even be an argument that West Ham thought they had
done everything correctly, but this is not the time or place to discuss
this. So, with the legal grounds for McCabe's challenge falling out from
under his feet, maybe this was the factor which has led him to this 21 team
compromise? Possibly, but unlikely.

The real reason can be found in Sheffield United's statement that was
released as they initiated arbitration proceedings. At the very bottom of
the statement, they outline their four objectives that they are 'seeking to
achieve' from this arbitration. The very last objective reads '"(d) An
assessment of the club's potential claim for damages'.

And there we have it. After all the bluster about fair play and justice,
McCabe finally gets to the crux of the matter – cold hard cash. Those clubs
who get to eat at the top table of the Premier League get to eat all the
juiciest prime cuts from the spit roasted cash cow that funds the game.
Everyone below that, gets the scraps that are discarded. After a season
eating prime ribeye and fillet, McCabe clearly has no wish to suffer another
season eating offal or minced spinal cord. With the cash cow due to be
replaced by a behemoth of an ox next season, the stakes (if you will pardon
the pun) are even higher.

So the idea of a 21 team league becomes, in simple terms, " I don't
actually mind whether or not West Ham stay up, as long as I get my share of
the money".

The carefully orchestrated campaign to hoodwink the people of the land into
thinking this is all about justice has worked superbly. West Ham, previously
many neutrals favoured second team, are now demonised as the epitome of
filthy underhandedness and caddish behaviour. As McCabe has ridden his steed
alongside Whelan, with his banner of justice hanging flaccidly in the wind,
thousands have flocked to follow him. But if they took the time to look
closer, they will see his surcoat is not emblazoned with the blood red cross
of the crusader, but with a rather grubby pound sign.


::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Season of chaos begins and ends with Tevez - all3points.com
18th May 2007
By Dan Halton

A disruptive and controversial season that began with hope, descended into
despair but has now ended in sheer joy saw Carlos Tevez play a significant
part from start to finish.

A season review for any other Premiership club would look fairly tame
compared to what has happened to West Ham this year. For those of an
impatient nature, here is a potted history for you to consider. Club signs
two world-class stars from Argentina in undisclosed deal. Club is bought out
by Icelandic consortium. Team goes on worst run of form in years and manager
is sacked. New manager continues appalling run of form and team battle
relegation all season. A number of players admit to gambling and drinking
addictions. Captain threatens to leave. Star defender lies to club about
funeral so he can party instead in the US. The Argentina deal gets
investigated halfway through the season and is found to be illegal. Club is
given biggest fine in history of the league. Other clubs are angry and
demand West Ham get docked points. Team goes on best run of form in years
and escapes relegation on last day. I bet the Everton review won't top that
for excitement.

The anger and bitterness felt by the so-called "Gang of Four" over the Tevez
controversy is matched only by the relief and joy of West Ham fans as we
celebrate the greatest escape of all great escapes. Eight weeks ago we were
dead and buried - ten points from safety with an atrocious goal difference
and disjointed team. Now, on the pitch at least, West Ham have succeeded
against all the odds in securing their place at the glamorous and lucrative
Premiership table once more.

Back in August it was all so different. Tevez and fellow countryman Javier
Mascherano were paraded as the new signings that manager Alan Pardew proudly
announced would put West Ham on to the next level. He cannot have envisaged
that level to be one that saw us eliminated from the UEFA Cup at the first
hurdle, lose seven games in a row and drop into the relegation zone. By
December, with the team in freefall after several defeats, the club is
transferred to Icelandic hands with incoming chairman Eggert Magnusson
immediately replacing one Alan for another.

Curbishley was heralded as the right man for the right job at the right
time. His first match in charge could not have gone any better as the
champions-elect Manchester United were humbled at Upton Park. But dismal
losses over the Christmas and New Year period including a humiliating 6-0
defeat at Reading left the Hammers firmly stuck in the relegation mire.
Worse was to follow in the shape of gambling scandals and personality
clashes which at one point saw West Ham's season threaten to implode
completely. The media were hunting like wolves and salivated at stories of
wantaway captain Nigel Reo-Coker and getaway Anton Ferdinand.

The ever-developing crisis sparked panic shopping during January as £17m was
spent on six new faces. The gamble initially failed to pay off as injuries
first handicapped Lucas Neill and then ended Matthew Upson's season
altogether. The form of the others made it look like a total waste of money
with Nigel Quashie failing to justify even his meagre price tag but
gradually Luis Boa Morte and, more importantly, Neill brought much-needed
calm and experience to an unsettled side.

As it was, Curbishley ended up dealing with much the same team that Pardew
had. Dean Ashton remained frustratingly absent through injury but Mark
Noble's introduction into midfield was a masterstroke. His aggression and
work-rate alongside Reo-Coker gave the team a solid centre. He was to star
in the most excruciating defeat all year when Spurs snatched a 4-3 victory
with two late goals deep into stoppage time. The depths of despair we felt
that night were never reached again however as the moment our season turned
around was just around the corner.

The date and venue can be pinpointed precisely – 17 March, Ewood Park,
Blackburn. The Hammers are one down with twenty minutes to go. The rain is
pelting down and any survival chances are hanging by a thread. Suddenly a
West Ham attack sees the ball pinging around the penalty area only for
Tevez, in attempting to get out of the way, to bizarrely block the ball on
the line. Believing the ball had crossed the line, assistant John Devine
holds aloft his flag and instructs the referee to allow a goal. A
controversial penalty soon followed and incredibly the Hammers had won their
first league game for three months. Luck, good fortune, call it what you
want. All season we had had none of it but that moment heralded an almighty
change in our fortunes that ended this Sunday with victory at Old Trafford
and ultimately survival in the Premiership. Mr Devine, you deserve our
gratitude.

By the time we clinched victory on the final day the team was settled,
confident and bang in form. The run of seven wins out of nine ranks as the
best run in the top-flight since 1986 when we finished third. A win was eked
out at Arsenal but the hammering Wigan got in their own backyard was far
more satisfying and laid down a crucial marker in the relegation battle.

A lot of credit must go Curbishley's way for turning this around. He may
have all the perkiness of a teabag but I sense someone who demands (and
gets) the most from his players and one who has been thick-skinned enough to
deal with all the upheavals over the past five months. A lesser man would
have folded. Credit due also to Magnusson for sticking with his man and
maintaining an amazing amount of faith through troubled times.

Honourable mentions for the season go to Rob Green who was immense in goal
and Bobby Zamora who showed incredible determination to succeed after an
alarming dip in form mid-season. But the player everyone will remember this
season for all sorts of reasons is Carlos Tevez. The supremely gifted
forward came to the club in a blaze of publicity and controversy and has
probably ended it in the same fashion. With reports that he has played his
last game for us I thank him for the free-kicks, the celebrations, the spark
he gave our attack and more importantly the goal he scored at Old Trafford.
All he wanted to do is play football and boy am I glad he did as he has left
us with some fantastic moments to treasure. And a place in the Premiership.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Hypocrisy of Whelan clouds reason - all3points.com
18th May 2007
By Darren Morgan

As the final whistle blew at Bramall Lane on Saturday, the loudest sound to
be heard was the tapping of laptop keyboards as the press corps prepared to
add yet more column inches to the file marked 'Carlos Tevez'. The only
respite from the incessant patter of stubby digits on keys came from the
interviews with Wigan chairman Dave Whelan and Sheffield United Plc chairman
Kevin McCabe. Presented with the ideal opportunity to continue airing their
dirty laundry in public, tirades against Tevez, West Ham United and the
Premier League spewed forth. The tapping in the press box intensified.

The public has been exposed to more than enough coverage on this story.
Every man and his dog have had their say. Two Sheffield MP's are even going
to table a motion in the House of Commons in order to get points deducted
from West Ham – a worthwhile use of their enormous salaries, I'm sure you'll
agree. Given the blanket coverage on the issue, I hope you will indulge me
while I try to set the record straight.

The majority of the general ill feeling towards the Hammers has been borne
largely out of lazy journalism and a simple misunderstanding of the rules of
the Premier League and the ruling of the independent panel that judged West
Ham's case. Instead of researching the topic, journalists have been happy to
casually toss around phrases like 'ineligible' and the largely ignorant
public have lapped it up.

Dan Johnson of the Premier League has recently clarified the issue: "This
has never been a question of West Ham fielding an ineligible player. From
the day they signed him, West Ham have owned his registration. That has
never been an issue. West Ham have never tried to conceal the fact Tevez and
Javier Mascherano are owned by Kia Joorabchian and MSI. That is not against
the rules. The only problem we had with the deal was the existence of a
clause in the agreement, which would allow Joorabchian to sell the players
to another club at any time. On the day of the inquiry's judgment, West Ham
chose to terminate the third-party agreement with Joorabchian. They
presented the Premier League with written evidence of the new arrangement."

All clear? Let's hope so.

Still more confusion has arisen as people have struggled to discern the
difference between the FA and the Premier League. Conspiracy theories abound
how Trevor Brooking's presence in the FA's corridors of power helped West
Ham to avoid a points deduction. Let's be certain of one thing here. The FA
and the Premier League are 2 very separate entities, and it is not unheard
of for one to take great delight in the others misfortune. Brian Barwick has
probably spent the last 2 months laughing himself silly at the beleaguered
Premier League, taking schadenfreude to a level previously unknown.

It is unlikely that too many people will pay attention to these facts at
this late stage. The press have done a wonderful job in misinforming the
public, and they will not easily be swayed.

It is unfortunate that this is the case, as the public are missing out on a
more pertinent point of issue. Whilst Sheffield United and McCabe's ire is
understandable, albeit misplaced, they are entirely to blame. McCabe's
statement that his side's last day defeat to 10 man Wigan was not the 'root
cause' of their problems is true. It was the fact that they only won 10
games all the season that was the root cause of the relegation. It was the
fact that he employed a manager and players who felt secure enough at 10
points clear to take their collective foot off the pedal. It was the fact
that they allowed themselves to be conned into joining Whelan's campaign
rather than concentrating on football. Sorry Blades fans – you deserved so
much better for all your wonderful support this season. Your club has let
you down badly.

But it is Whelan's appearance as the Richard the Lionheart in this crusade
for 'justice' that really sticks in the gullet. For a number of weeks now,
the most spurious of accusations and bile have vomited their way out of his
snide maw, undermining the efforts of his team and manager. He has taken
every opportunity to demand that justice be done.

This is, unless I am mistaken, the same Dave Whelan whose JJB sports shops
were fined £6.7m in 2003 for being part of a price fixing cartel in
overcharging fans for England replica shirts and Manchester United replica
shirts. This headache is not yet over as Which magazine have now issued
proceedings in the Competition Appeals Tribunal as they attempt to get the
fine repaid to the consumers who were ripped off by Whelan.

It is also the same Dave Whelan who owns Wigan Warriors rugby league club.
The same Wigan Warriors who, in August 2006, were found guilty of breaching
the 2005 salary cap that the Rugby Football League imposes on its member
clubs. They were fined a paltry £50,000, for conduct prejudicial to the
interests of the game, and had two points deducted for the breach – the
mandatory punishment.

With this marvellous background in defrauding the public and relevant
authorities, 'Dodgy Dave' has been strutting around with the kind of
previous that Jeffrey Archer would be ashamed of.

As Wigan Athletic slipped perilously closer to relegation, Whelan took up
the mantle of being the paragon of justice and fairness. His protestations
would be far more credible if they were not accompanied by the rancid stench
of hypocrisy.


::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

http://vyperz.blogspot.com

Friday, May 18

Web Digest [ West Ham United ] - 18th May 2007

Stats show Lucas is top Hammer - WHUFC
17/05/2007 11:33

The season's over and the stats are in! The Actim Index - the Official
Player Ratings of the Barclays Premiership - has revealed that Australian
international defender Lucas Neill is The Hammers' Actim Player of the
Season 2006/2007.

Lucas, who finished 81st in the final Index, is West Ham United's highest
ranked player in the Index this season with 355 points. He has contributed
14 shots, 101 tackles, 40 clearances, 45 interceptions, nine blocks, nine
dribbles, 261 passes, 39 crosses and five assists in 2,881 minutes of
football.

Other West Ham United players who have also ranked highly in the Actim Index
during the 2006/07 season are Bobby Zamora (86th), Anton Ferdinand (117th),
Nigel Reo Coker (120th) and Robert Green (126th).

Argentine striker Carlos Tevez finished the season in 222nd position after
playing 1,789 minutes of Premiership football.

The Actim Index is calculated using a unique mathematical formula that rates
each player's contribution be it goals, shots, passes, dribbles, tackles,
crosses, saves, clearances, blocks, interceptions, time on the pitch or
number of points gained by the team with marks deducted for red and yellow
cards. Two additional calculations, which take account of player assists and
goalkeeper's clean sheets, have been added this season to increase the
amount of variables a player is now measured by.

Analysis of all Premiership games has taken place throughout the league
campaign and the top five West Ham United players in the Actim Index this
season are:

Lucas Neill 26th Highest Ranked Defender
Bobby Zamora 22nd Highest Ranked Striker
Anton Ferdinand 36th Highest Ranked Defender
Nigel Reo-Coker 35th Highest Ranked Midfielder
Robert Green 16th Highest Ranked Goalkeeper

Actim Stats also revealed that after 38 Premiership games this season the
following players are the Hammers' highest achievers in six areas of play:
completed passes, completed crosses, dribbles, tackles won, blocks made and
most assists.


Top Passer Nigel Reo-Coker Midfielder
Top Crosser Matthew Etherington Midfielder
Top Dribbler Nigel Reo-Coker Midfielder
Top Tackler Nigel Reo-Coker Midfielder
Top Blocker Anton Ferdinand Defender
Most Assists Lucas Neill Defender

The list of the Top 100 players and Top 5 players by position will be
available free of charge from the Actim website which will be updated during
the football season every Tuesday for the Barclays Premiership and every
Thursday for The Coca-Cola Championship.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Whelan demands league chiefs quit - BBC

Wigan chairman Dave Whelan says Premier League chief executive Richard
Scudamore should consider quitting in the wake of the West Ham controversy.
Whelan believes the league should have cancelled Carlos Tevez's registration
after the Hammers were found guilty of breaking rules over his signing. In a
letter to the League, Whelan accused Scudamore and chairman Dave Richards of
a "dereliction of duties". He added: "The pair of you should consider
resigning."
West Ham were found guilty of breaching two Premier League rules when they
signed Tevez and fellow Argentine Javier Mascherano - who moved to Liverpool
in January. An independent commission fined the club £5.5m and told the
Premier League it could terminate Tevez's registration. But West Ham assured
the Premier League they had ripped up the offending contract with
third-party company MSI/JSI and Tevez was allowed to play the following day
- in a 3-0 win over Wigan. Whelan, who has also sent his letter to the 19
other Premier League clubs, claims the decision to allow Tevez to play on
was taken in a telephone conversation. He said: "I would like to once again
ask the question in my email of 11 May, did you actually receive a copy of
the documentation from West Ham which showed that the original agreement
between West Ham and MSI/JSI had been cancelled? "The judgment given by the
independent panel ordered that the registration of Tevez could be terminated
by the Premier League. "You then proceeded to hold a board meeting by
telephone between yourself, the chairman and the secretary. "I am appalled
that the chairman would allow such an important decision to be made on the
basis of a telephone call. "Surely a decision of this magnitude required an
open and full discussion. "You had been ordered by the chairman of the
commission to seriously consider the termination of this contract. "Your
failure to do so in my mind is a dereliction of duties of both the chairman
and yourself and you should consider resigning."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Eidur rumours untrue, says Eggert - KUMB
Filed: Thursday, 17th May 2007
By: Matthew O'Greel

Eggert Magnusson has dismissed rumours that West Ham United are seeking to
sign Barcelona's Icelandic striker Eidur Gudjohnsen. One of the first
transfer stories to emerge since West Ham secured their Premiership status
last weekend concerned a supposed bid by United for the former Chelsea
player, who is thought to be unsettled in Spain. But Magnusson, speaking to
Icelandic paper Morgunbladid today denied that any discussion with view to a
bid had taken place. "These stories are not true," he said. "I have not
talked to Eidur and his name has not come out during our discussions of new
players. "As soon as the transfer window opens the stories will intensify
and more often it is the agents talking their players up. "I am not saying
that is what is happening with Eidur but I think these stories are popping
up because West Ham has Icelandic ownership. "As far as I know Eidur has a
long term contract with Barcelona and he is the type of player who will get
stronger when the going gets tough."
And Magnusson also revealed that he was looking forward to seeing one new
striker - for him, at least - already on West Ham's books; one Dean Ashton,
who is expected to return to full training in the next few weeks. "We have a
phenominal player in Dean who didn't play last season because of injury," he
added, "but he will be ready and roaring to go next season. "He is an
outstanding player and its annoying how the media tends to forget that he
actually exists. How can they forget such a player?"

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tevez: yours for £40m - KUMB
Filed: Thursday, 17th May 2007
By: Matthew O'Greel

West Ham United have been told they can buy Carlos Tevez outright - for a
fee in the region of £40m. That is according to the Daily Mail, who spoke
with Tevez's agent/owner Kia Joorabchian last night. Joorabchian - who lost
out in the race for United to Eggert Magnuson's Icelandic consortium last
November - also revealed that recent reports of bids for Tevez from one or
two European giants were false. "We haven't held talks with any club,
contrary to what you might have read," he said. "This morning it was Inter
Milan, the other day it was Real Madrid - but these stories are the work of
fiction. "West Ham's board have to decide what their intentions are. Maybe
they will think they want Carlos and build around him - or maybe they will
think that they can buy four or five great players for the money instead.
"[Carlos] has a great affection for the club — and the supporters. The
decision on his future is his. He has been very happy there."
Joorabchian also confirmed that Tevez's original contract had been torn up
as a result of the Premier League enquiry's initial findings; an issue at
the heart of Sheffield United's latest attack on the Premier League; today's
request for arbitration. "West Ham unilaterally terminated the agreement and
I have left it in the hands of my lawyer, Graham Shear, to deal with the
matter," Joorabchian declared. "But we did everything right. The proof is
in the pudding, because nobody at the Premier League asked for me to go
there and give evidence [at the hearing]. They knew that we had behaved
correctly. We used top lawyers, top accountants. "We made sure everything
was done, We've been involved in many other deals and didn't have a single
problem. It wasn't a shady transfer. It wasn't a controversial transfer. It
wasn't a strange transfer. "It has been said of the old administration at
West Ham that they had not presented the correct documents to the Premier
League. I don't know, but whatever happened I'm sure could have been
repaired to prevent all this controversy. "What I am very upset about — and
sad about — is that Carlos has been dragged into this affair, when he has
nothing to do with it."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Scudamore makes Whelan call - Sky
By Chris Stanton - Created on 17 May 2007

Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore has hit back at Dave Whelan
for the Wigan chairman's suggestion he should resign over the Carlos Tevez
affair. Scudamore telephoned Whelan after The Latics supremo made what
amounted to a personal attack on Scudamore, as well as Premier League
chairman Sir Dave Richards, via e-mail. The 20 Premiership clubs were also
recipients of the email and a Premier League spokesman revealed Scudamore
was keen to get relations back on a more cordial footing. "The Premier
League board and Mr Whelan have spoken today and both parties have agreed to
continue their discussions in a manner more appropriate to league business,"
said the spokesman. "As such Mr Whelan has agreed to submit his remaining
questions of the board in full and in writing. The board will respond in due
course."
Whelan has led the call for the Premier League to re-examine the severity of
the punishment meted out to The Hammers for transfer irregularities,
regarding Tevez. The Wigan man believes West Ham were let off the hook with
only a fine, rather than a points deduction that could ultimately have led
to their relegation.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Mawhinney quiet on Tevez affair - Sky
By James Pearson - Created on 17 May 2007

Football League chairman Lord Mawhinney is letting the Premier League deal
with the Carlos Tevez row. Sheffield United are unhappy Carlos Tevez played
a key role in West Ham's survival, despite The Hammers breaking regulations
regarding his registration. When asked what Mawhinney thought of the row and
The Blades' proposal of a 21-team Premiership, he distanced himself from
getting involved. "As chairman of the Football League it's got nothing to
do with us. It's a matter for the Premier League, they're handling it," he
told Sky Sports News. "Do I have confidence in the people who are running
the Premier League? Of course I do. But it's not our issue. "For
four-and-a-half years I've made it a point of not interfering in what
happens in the Premier League. Thank you for the invite, but I'm not going
to start now. "We will wait to receive from the Premier League the three
teams that come down. We will make them very welcome. "We will embrace them
as part of the Football League family while always understanding that they
will want to get back to the Premier League as quickly as they can."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Scudamore holds showdown Tevez talks with Whelan - Soccernet

Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore has held showdown talks
with Wigan chairman Dave Whelan after the sportswear supremo called on him
to resign over the Carlos Tevez affair. Scudamore phoned Whelan today in
response to an email from the Wigan chairman saying he and Premier League
chairman Sir Dave Richards should consider resigning 'over a dereliction of
duty'. The personal nature of the attack marked a new development in the row
over West Ham, but Scudamore told Whelan he had got the wrong end of the
stick. A Premier League spokesman said: 'The Premier League board and Mr
Whelan have spoken today and both parties have agreed to continue their
discussions in a manner more appropriate to League business. 'As such Mr
Whelan has agreed to submit his remaining questions of the board in full and
in writing. The board will respond in due course.'
The row is over an independent commission's decision to fine West Ham
£5.5million rather than dock the club points for signing third-party
agreements in contravention of league rules. In the email to Scudamore and
all the other top-flight clubs, Whelan stated: 'You had been ordered by the
chairman of the commission to seriously consider the termination of this
contract. 'Your failure to do so in my mind is a dereliction of the duties
of both the chairman and yourself and the pair of you should consider
resigning.'
It is understood Scudamore told Whelan that the commission had not ordered
them to consider terminating Tevez's registration, but stated the league had
the power to do so if they felt the third-party agreements had not been
ended. The league however were satisfied that West Ham did end those
agreements on April 27. Scudamore and the league's lawyers are still
discussing how to respond to Sheffield United's claim for the dispute to go
an arbitration panel.
Meanwhile, sports minister Richard Caborn has reiterated his call for all
parties to settle the row out of court. It is understood that Caborn has
been approached by both sides and advised them to try to find a solution
that does not involve a judge's ruling. Caborn said: 'What I had said is
that all parties need to make every endeavour to make sure this is settled
outside of the courts.'

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
MSI deny 'shady' Tevez transfer - TeamTalk

Iranian businessman Kia Joorabchian insists there was nothing "shady" about
Carlos Tevez's controversial transfer to West Ham. Joorabchian's MSI group
took the Argentine striker to Upton Park last August, but the deal has
created a storm in the Premiership. The Hammers were fined £5.5million
regarding the move, while Sheffield United have launched legal action after
Tevez's goals kept the club in the top flight. But Joorabchian is at pains
to stress there was nothing underhand in the transfer and that it was simply
the same as a player moving between clubs on loan. "It was a situation
similar to Alex Song going to Charlton, or Tim Howard to Everton, or Glen
Johnson to Portsmouth," Joorabchian told the Daily Mail. "We did everything
right. The proof is in the pudding because nobody at the Premier League
asked for me to go there and give evidence. They knew that we had behaved
correctly. "We used top lawyers, top accountants. We made sure everything
was done. We've been involved in many other deals and didn't have a single
problem. "It wasn't a shady transfer. It wasn't a controversial transfer. It
wasn't a strange transfer. "It has been said of the old administration at
West Ham that they had not presented the correct documents to the Premier
League. I don't know, but whatever happened I'm sure could have been
repaired to prevent all this controversy."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Whelan: I will not back down - teamTalk
By David Bond
Last Updated: 1:04am BST 18/05/2007

Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore held peace talks with the
Wigan chairman David Whelan yesterday in another attempt to head off the
growing revolt over the Carlos Tevez controversy. In a dramatic escalation
in the dispute, Whelan wrote to Scudamore and League chairman Sir David
Richards on Wednesday calling for them to resign over their handling of the
Tevez case. Whelan claimed the League's two most senior figures were guilty
of a "dereliction of duty" following their decision to allow the Argentina
striker to carry on playing for West Ham even though they admitted breaking
rules on third-party ownership. Scudamore rejected calls for him to consider
his pos-ition and, in a telephone conversation yesterday, appealed to Whelan
to tone down public attacks on him and the League. But Wigan sources said
that, while Whelan was prepared to conduct negotiations on the dispute in
private, he would not back down: "There has been no softening in the
chairman's position. He is still very angry and wants answers to the
questions he has repeatedly been asking."
In a thinly veiled attack on Whelan's outspoken style, a League spokesman
said: "The Premier League board and Mr Whelan have spoken today and both
parties have agreed to continue their discussions in a manner more
appropriate to League business. "As such Mr Whelan has agreed to submit his
remaining questions of the board in full and in writing. The board will
respond in due course."
Even that is understood to have irritated Whelan, with Wigan claiming he
only went public after Scudamore failed to provide proof that Tevez's
contract was terminated after the April 27 decision to fine West Ham
£5.5million. Whelan is questioning how the League can be sure the
third-party agreements with the two offshore companies which own Tevez were
cancelled. Kia Joorabchian, the Anglo-Iranian businessman who controls the
player, said yest-erday that he was considering legal action after West
Ham's decision to rip up the deal. Scudamore told Whelan that he had
mistakenly interpreted the independent commission's ruling. In a separate
development, Scudamore and the League's lawyers have been given until
tomorrow by relegated Sheffield United to set up an arbitration panel to
reconsider the commission's original decision.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Hammers horror gave Magnusson his belief - Telegraph
By David Bond
Last Updated: 1:04am BST 18/05/2007

Eggert Magnusson can remember the moment he knew West Ham would escape
relegation from the Premiership but it wasn't following the final whistle at
Old Trafford last Sunday. Bizarrely, it was after a game that looked like
the most shattering defeat of an unbelievable season.The date was Sunday
March 4 and Tottenham had just beaten Alan Curbishley's side in a game which
proved as difficult to pin down as Jose Mourinho's dog. Twice Spurs had come
from behind to level at Upton Park before Paul Stalteri scored an
injury-time winner to earn an unthinkable 4-3 triumph.

Up in the directors' box the 60-year-old Magnusson could not bear to watch.
At the final whistle, Sky's cameras focused on him as he drew a hand slowly
across his eyes, before parting his fingers to peek at his devastated
players on the pitch below. At that point most people would have accepted
the game was up. West Ham were rock bottom of the table without a win since
mid- December.

But the club's Icelandic chairman says he never lost the faith. And he is
convinced that the game against Tottenham proved the turning point in one of
the Premier League's most thrilling and dramatic story-lines. "The Tottenham
game was a hard blow for us," said Magnusson yesterday. "But we played good
football and didn't deserve to lose. That game, in a way, set the tone for
the rest of the season. Football is so much about confidence and once you
lose that it goes downhill and it's hard to build it up again. But that
game, strangely, gave everyone a lift."

For a man who has just watched his club escape relegation by the skin of
their teeth, Magnusson does not wear the demeanour of a man who has just
pulled off one of the greatest escapes in the game's history. He is smiling
but his characteristic effervescence is missing as he walks into the West
Ham boardroom. To be frank, he looks shattered. And who would be surprised?
Since becoming chairman in the autumn, following a protracted £108 million
takeover battle for the club, Magnusson has experienced nearly every emotion
the game has to offer.

Besides events on the pitch there have been gambling scandals, players going
AWOL in America and, of course, the ongoing row over Carlos Tevez, which
resulted in West Ham being hit with a record breaking £5.5 million fine last
month for breaking rules on third-party ownership.

The dispute between the Premier League and the 'gang of four' looks set to
rumble on into the summer, but, as far as Magnusson is concerned, last
Sunday's 1-0 win over Manchester United at Old Trafford was the final word.

So, how did it feel to know his team were safe, after the final whistle? "I
was like a deflated balloon," he said. "I was very happy. More happy than I
can describe. But at the same time, it took all the wind out of me. I never
gave up the hope. But for sure there had been so many things happening since
I came here. There seemed to be a new problem every day. On Sunday night
when I got home I was almost speechless. I could only think about how happy
I was for the team, the manager and the fans.

"I have been all the time optimistic, but of course, I had my darker
moments. But then you give yourself a kick and don't think this way. You
have to have faith.

"I have enjoyed it all enormously. The experiences I have had over the last
few months, I wouldn't have missed them for anything in the world."

Having put his own emotions through the wringer, Magnusson must have a sense
of what Sheffield United chairman Kevin McCabe and former manager Neil
Warnock felt when they were sent down by their defeat against Wigan on
Sunday. But, with so much rancour around, Magnusson says he hasn't contacted
anyone at Sheffield to offer his sympathies.

He said: "I have not called anyone at Sheffield. It's difficult. But I feel
for them. It's difficult to go down. But I feel some things that have been
said about this great club are unjustified."

Magnusson is clearly angry at the way West Ham have become, to borrow
Curbishley's expression, 'public enemy No 1'. He feels a number of people in
the game have overstepped the mark with their criticism of the club.

But, for now, he is keeping his head down and waiting for the dust to
settle. He believes the dispute with Wigan, Charlton, Fulham and Sheffield
United over the handling of the Tevez case is a matter for the Premier
League. In the meantime, he is getting on with planning for next season. He
held a meeting with Curbishley on Wednesday and will sit down with him after
he returns from a break in Florida next week to discuss what will be a busy
summer of restructuring.

The first item on the agenda is certain to be the future of Tevez, although
he says he has not yet held any meetings with his owner and agent Kia
Joorabchian, the man whose third-party agreements with the club landed them
at the centre of the storm.

Yesterday, Joorabchian, who at one stage was bidding against Magnusson to
buy the club, claimed in an interview that he and his offshore owners will
still be the financial beneficiaries if the Argentine striker moves from
Upton Park in the next few weeks.

Magnusson refuses to disclose whether the club still have an option to buy
the player, even though West Ham have terminated their agreements with the
two companies who own him, Media Sports Investments and Just Sport
Incorporated. He also declines to discuss what happened when those
agreements were ripped up following the April 27 ruling from the Premier
League's appointed commission. But he says there should be no question marks
over who holds his registration.

He said: "From my point of view both Tevez and [Javier] Mascherano were
registered correctly on Aug 31 and the registration of Tevez has been
correct from that date until the end of the season. There should be no
dispute. There have been all sorts of misinterpretations on this but
everyone agrees on this, including Fifa and the Premier League."

Despite the increasingly bitter dispute, Magnusson says he holds no grudges
against Joorabchian.

Magnusson said: "There hasn't been too much of a relationship between Kia
and myself. But I cannot hold him responsible for what happened here. He
probably didn't know anything about the fact that these third-party
agreements were not disclosed to the Premier League.

"When I took over the club, I had no idea until January that these
agreements had not been disclosed to the Premier League. I had no way of
knowing that, how would I? I am sure he didn't know anything about that. I
have no bitterness towards him, why should I?

"Sometime in the near future I hope to have a meeting with him. We will sit
down and discuss Tevez's future."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tevez out, Bellamy in - the Sun
By PAT SHEEHAN
May 18, 2007

WEST HAM want Craig Bellamy to replace Carlos Tevez. Hammers boss Alan
Curbishley and chairman Eggert Magnusson feel signing the £8million-rated
Liverpool striker will prove the club's ambition following their narrow
escape from relegation. Magnusson, who aims to get the club into the
Champions League in three years' time, will pay the Wales star £60,000 a
week. Tevez, tipped for a £30m move to Real Madrid that will not earn West
Ham a penny, has returned to Argentina. Premier League chief executive
Richard Scudamore has told Wigan chairman Dave Whelan he got his facts wrong
over last month's inquiry into the Carlos Tevez deal. Whelan accused
Scudamore and League chairman Dave Richards of 'dereliction of duty' in
their handling of the Tevez affair and called for them to resign. He
believed the League had been ordered to terminate Tevez's contract by last
month's independent inquiry. And he did not feel the striker should have
been allowed to play in the Hammers' 3-0 win at the JJB Stadium. But
Scudamore phoned him to point out the inquiry simply gave the League powers
to terminate Tevez's contract if West Ham did not scrap an agreement with
Kia Joorabchian, the players' owner. That clause, allowing Joorabchian to
sell Tevez when he wanted, was immediately removed by West Ham. That was
why they were fined £5.5million by the League rather than having points
deducted.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Hammers still want Benayoun - Haaretz.com
By Uzi Dann

West Ham is interested in retaining Yossi Benayoun, the team' told the
midfielder at a meeting yesterday. Benayoun has two years left on his
contract with the club. The Hammers offered Benayoun a five-year contract
with a significant raise. The midfielder and his agent Ronen Katzav are
leaning toward accepting the offer. The two sides are set to meet again next
week. Several English clubs including Tottenham, Portsmouth and Newcastle
have expressed interest in Benayoun, but since he is under contract, none
have conducted negotiations with him.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
League hits back against Whelan - The Times
James Ducker

Dave Whelan, the Wigan Athletic chairman, has been criticised after he
called on Richard Scudamore, the FA Premier League chief executive, to
resign in a letter to the Barclays Premiership clubs. Scudamore has
telephoned Whelan, who is unhappy that the League has not provided proof
that Carlos Tévez, the forward, was eligible to play for West Ham United.

"We [Whelan and the League] have agreed to continue discussions in a manner
more appropriate to League business," a Premier League spokesman said. "Mr
Whelan has agreed to submit his remaining questions of the board in full and
in writing."

David Unsworth's reward for keeping Wigan in the Premiership on the final
day of the season, by scoring the winning penalty in the 2-1 win away to
Sheffield United, was to be released yesterday as Chris Hutchings's first
move as manager was to wield the axe. Arjan de Zeeuw, the captain, was also
released.

"David did a brilliant job," the manager said. "His goal against Sheffield
United will live long in the memory and its significance can never be
underestimated. I wish him all the best for the future." Sheffield United
have confirmed that Bryan Robson, the former West Bromwich Albion and
Middlesbrough manager, is the front-runner to succeed Neil Warnock. As
revealed in The Timesyesterday, Robson is being primed to take over at
Bramall Lane and it is understood that preliminary talks have taken place.
Further discussions are scheduled for early next week, but other candidates
are being considered.

Terry Robinson, the football club chairman at Bramall Lane, said: "We are
looking for experience so Bryan Robson, Peter Reid and Dave Bassett would
fit the bill in many ways."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Scudamore will speak to Whelan
Dominic Fifield
Friday May 18, 2007
The Guardian

Richard Scudamore, the Premier League's chief executive, has expressed a
willingness to discuss Dave Whelan's complaint about Carlos Tevez with the
Wigan chairman. The league's board is expected to inform relegated Sheffield
United next week whether it will enter arbitration in the dispute about the
West Ham player. Scudamore telephoned Whelan yesterday in response to an
email sent by the Latics chairman to the Premier League and its 19 other
member clubs which suggested that the chief executive (along with the
chairman, Dave Richards) should consider his position over a "dereliction of
duty".

"Mr Whelan has agreed to submit his remaining questions of the board in full
and in writing. The board will respond in due course," said a Premier League
spokesman. Whelan wants proof that West Ham have cancelled their third-party
agreement with Kia Joorabchian's Media Sports Investment, which owned Tevez,
after the Premier League independent commission fined the Hammers £5.5m but
did not deduct points. The board is adamant West Ham have proved the
agreement has been cancelled. Joorabchian indicated yesterday that the
contract had been "unilaterally terminated" on April 27.
"As far as West Ham are concerned there is no more to be said on this," said
a club spokesman.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Rangers eyeing West Ham's Konchesky
tribalfooball.com - May 17, 2007

Rangers are planning a bid for West Ham United fullback Paul Konchesky. The
Herald says Gers boss Walter Smith plans to move for the England cap, who is
also interesting Aston Villa.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham to offer £7M for Liverpool's Bellamy
tribalfooball.com - May 17, 2007

West Ham United are chasing Liverpool striker Craig Bellamy - as a
replacement for Carlos Tevez. The Sun says Hammers boss Alan Curbishley and
chairman Eggert Magnusson feel signing the £8million-rated Liverpool striker
will prove the club's ambition following their narrow escape from
relegation. Magnusson, who aims to get the club into the Champions League in
three years' time, will pay the Wales star £60,000 a week. Tevez, tipped for
a £30m move to Real Madrid that will not earn West Ham a penny, has returned
to Argentina.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

http://vyperz.blogspot.com

Thursday, May 17

Web Digest [ West Ham United ] - 17th May 2007

Tevez: yours for £40m - KUMB
Filed: Thursday, 17th May 2007
By: Matthew O'Greel

West Ham United have been told they can buy Carlos Tevez outright - for a
fee in the region of £40m. That is according to the Daily Mail, who spoke
with Tevez's agent/owner Kia Joorabchian last night. Joorabchian - who lost
out in the race for United to Eggert Magnuson's Icelandic consortium last
November - also revealed that recent reports of bids for Tevez from one or
two European giants were false. "We haven't held talks with any club,
contrary to what you might have read," he said. "This morning it was Inter
Milan, the other day it was Real Madrid - but these stories are the work of
fiction. "West Ham's board have to decide what their intentions are. Maybe
they will think they want Carlos and build around him - or maybe they will
think that they can buy four or five great players for the money instead.
"[Carlos] has a great affection for the club — and the supporters. The
decision on his future is his. He has been very happy there."
Joorabchian also confirmed that Tevez's original contract had been torn up
as a result of the Premier League enquiry's initial findings; an issue at
the heart of Sheffield United's latest attack on the Premier League; today's
request for arbitration. "West Ham unilaterally terminated the agreement and
I have left it in the hands of my lawyer, Graham Shear, to deal with the
matter," Joorabchian declared. "But we did everything right. The proof is in
the pudding, because nobody at the Premier League asked for me to go there
and give evidence [at the hearing]. They knew that we had behaved correctly.
We used top lawyers, top accountants. "We made sure everything was done,
We've been involved in many other deals and didn't have a single problem. It
wasn't a shady transfer. It wasn't a controversial transfer. It wasn't a
strange transfer. "It has been said of the old administration at West Ham
that they had not presented the correct documents to the Premier League. I
don't know, but whatever happened I'm sure could have been repaired to
prevent all this controversy. "What I am very upset about — and sad about —
is that Carlos has been dragged into this affair, when he has nothing to do
with it."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Blades launch legal action - Sky
By Tom Adams - Created on 16 May 2007

Sheffield United have begun arbitration proceedings against the Premier
League as a result of the Carlos Tevez transfer controversy, with plc
chairman Kevin McCabe now proposing that England's top flight comprises 21
teams next season.

Sheffield United's legal complaint in full

Following relegation, The Blades are bitterly angry at the failure to
penalise West Ham with a points deduction despite being found guilty of
irregularities in the August signings of Tevez and former Hammer Javier
Mascherano.

A so-called 'Gang of Four' - comprising The Blades, Charlton, Wigan and
Fulham - have been canvassing support from their fellow clubs and The Blades
have also written to MPs in a bid to generate support for their cause.

McCabe served arbitration procedure notice on the Premier League on
Wednesday to continue the crusade against the perceived injustice, and has
again threatened further legal action if the league fails to accept his
letter.

However, the Blades plc chairman has also proposed a scenario whereby
Sheffield United would be reinstated to the league without West Ham being
demoted, resulting in the Premiership housing 21 teams next season.

"We are still working towards debating matters with the Premier League, we
want to undo the wrong and the injustice of the decision," McCabe told the
club's official website.

"The events off the field of play have culminated in our arbitration
procedures.

"We have written to every MP, explaining the background of the injustice and
that it needs to be satisfied for the good of the sport.

"First and foremost we're doing everything to protect the interests of
United.

"Will the Premier League accept our arbitration letters? Litigation can be
pursued and, if it has to be pursued, we'll do it.

"It is up to the FA Premier League to find a way round this exceptional
circumstance where a club which has played by the rules has been relegated
at the expense of one club who have fielded ineligible players.

"The simple answer is why not have 21 clubs in the Premiership next season
and relegate four of them at the end. It is not my decision to make but it
seems like a very simple solution."

Wigan chairman Dave Whelan has indicated that the disaffected clubs will
seek to prove that West Ham's re-registration of Tevez outside the transfer
window - and following the independent commission's findings - was illegal.

However, the Premier League looks unlikely to bow to McCabe's attempts to
establish an arbitration panel, with a spokesman underlining the league's
belief that no laws have been broken in the controversial row.

"We followed our processes to the letter and we ensured to our satisfaction
that the third party arrangements in relation to Carlos Tevez's contract
have been terminated," said a Premier League spokesman.

"We are more than happy to meet with officials of Sheffield United or any
other aggrieved club to offer clarification and explanation of this and we
have written to all 20 clubs with a forensic explanation of the ruling."

Fifa has already pledged to investigate the row which is threatening to drag
the relegation issue out over the summer.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Kia: Nothing shady in Tevez deal - Sky
By Mark Buckingham - Created on 17 May 2007

Kia Joorabchian insists there was nothing 'shady' about Carlos Tevez's
transfer to West Ham United. The Iranian businessman's MSI group took the
Argentine striker to Upton Park last August, but the deal has created a
storm in the Premiership. The Hammers were fined £5.5million regarding the
deal, while Sheffield United have launched legal action after Tevez's goals
kept the club in the top flight. But Joorabchian is at pains to stress there
was nothing underhand in the transfer and that it was simply the same as a
player moving between clubs on loan. "It was a situation similar to Alex
Song going to Charlton, or Tim Howard to Everton, or Glen Johnson to
Portsmouth," Joorabchian told the Daily Mail. "We did everything right. The
proof is in the pudding because nobody at the Premier League asked for me to
go there and give evidence. They knew that we had behaved correctly. "We
used top lawyers, top accountants. We made sure everything was done. We've
been involved in many other deals and didn't have a single problem. "It
wasn't a shady transfer. It wasn't a controversial transfer. It wasn't a
strange transfer. "It has been said of the old administration at West Ham
that they had not presented the correct documents to the Premier League. I
don't know, but whatever happened I'm sure could have been repaired to
prevent all this controversy."
Regarding Tevez's future at Upton Park, Joorabchian is adamant a decision
will be made by the club and the player, not MSI. He added: "West Ham's
board have to decide what their intentions are. Maybe they will think they
want Carlos and build around him. Or maybe they will think that, for the
money, they can buy four or five great players instead. "We haven't held
talks with any club, contrary to what you might have read. This morning it
was Inter Milan for £25m, the other day it was Real Madrid for £30m. These
stories are the work of fiction. "He has a great affection for the club and
the supporters. The decision on his future is his. He has been very happy
there."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
League chiefs told to resign - Telegraph
By David Bond
Last Updated: 3:35am BST 17/05/2007

Richard Scudamore and Sir David Richards, the chief executive and chairman
of the Premier League, last night faced calls to resign over their handling
of the Carlos Tevez controversy. As Sheffield United became the first member
of the 'gang of four' to file a legal claim against the League over the
decision not to dock West Ham points for breaking regulations on third-party
ownership, it emerged that Wigan chairman David Whelan has written to
Scudamore and Richards urging them to "consider their positions".

In an e-mail, sent to all 20 Premier League clubs yesterday, Whelan is
understood to have accused the League's two most senior figures of
neglecting their responsibilities over the decision to allow Tevez to
continue playing after the ruling by an independent commission on April 27.

The judgement gave the Premier League leave to cancel Tevez's registration
unless West Ham amended or cancelled their agreements with the Argentina
striker's offshore owners.

The League and West Ham maintain that the deals were "unilaterally
terminated" by the club, which allowed manager Alan Curbishley to continue
to use Tevez in his side's successful battle to avoid relegation.

But Whelan is believed to be "appalled" that the Premier League board
approved his registration following a phone call a few hours after the
commission delivered its verdict - the night before West Ham beat Wigan 3-0.

The latest twist in the increasingly fractious saga came as Sheffield United
called for the League to set up an arbitration panel aimed at overturning
the independent commission's original decision to fine West Ham £5.5
million.

United have hired law firm Denton Wilde Sapte to pursue the claim and
although no other clubs were named in a statement they issued last night, it
is understood the other clubs involved in the revolt, Charlton, Fulham and
Wigan, are backing the move.

As well as making a request for arbitration under the Premier League's rule
S4, United are questioning whether the independent commission acted
"lawfully, fairly and reasonably" and accuses the League of failing to
conduct "an adequate investigation into the continued fielding of Tevez
after the 27 April decision despite serious questions over his eligibility".

Demanding a new tribunal be established before the end of the week and to
deliver a final ruling within a month, United appealed to the League to put
preparations for next season on hold.

They said plans for the new campaign "wrongly assume that West Ham remains a
Premiership club and Sheffield United are relegated to the Championship".

The League acknowledged the legal claim from Sheffield United but refused to
comment on whether they would agree to set up an arbitration panel to
consider their claims. "We are in receipt of that request and it is under
consideration," said a spokesman.

However, in a six-page letter, sent to all clubs on Tuesday night and made
public yesterday, Richards and Scudamore say they will consider their rules
on third-party ownership again during the League's annual summer meeting in
two weeks' time.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
We want blood - Wigan demand Premiership chief quits - This Is London
17.05.07

The Premier League were plunged deeper into crisis last night after Wigan
chairman Dave Whelan called for their two top officials to resign. In a
letter to chief executive Richard Scudamore, Whelan claimed Scudamore and
chairman Dave Richards were guilty of a dereliction of duty' when they
allowed Carlos Tevez to represent West Ham in a crucial relegation match at
Wigan on April 28.

On a day when relegated Sheffield United filed arbitration proceedings
against the Premier League, Whelan said he was appalled' that Scudamore and
Richards did not follow the recommendation of an independent commission
chairman and cancel Tevez's registration.

Instead, claims Whelan, the Premier League held a telephone board meeting
and, having received assurances only from West Ham that the third-party
agreement with MSI/JSI, the player's offshore owners, had been terminated,
allowed Tevez to play the following day. He scored twice in a 3-0 win at the
JJB Stadium.

In the letter copied to the other 19 Premier League clubs, Whelan wrote: "I
would like to once again ask the question in my email of May 11, did you
actually receive a copy of the documentation from West Ham United which
showed that the original agreement between West Ham and MSI/JSI had been
cancelled?"

Whelan also asked about documentation from MSI/JSI giving permission to
cancel that agreement and whether the ownership of Tevez was then held by
West Ham. He added: "The judgment given by the independent panel ordered
that the registration of Tevez could be terminated by the Premier League.
You then proceeded to hold a board meeting by telephone between yourself,
the chairman and the secretary.

"I am appalled that the chairman would allow such an important decision to
be made on the basis of a telephone call.

"Surely a decision of this magnitude required an open and full discussion.
You had been ordered by the chairman of the commission to seriously consider
the termination of this contract. Your failure to do so in my mind is a
dereliction of the duties of both the chairman and yourself and the pair of
you should consider resigning."

Whelan's views were echoed by another senior club official, who said he was
staggered a £40million decision can be made over the telephone', while
referring to the original recommendations of the independent commission that
examined the Tevez case. "We order the registration of Carlos Tevez can be
terminated by the FA Premier League and we order that West Ham pay the cost
of those proceedings."

In an effort to satisfy the 20 Premier League clubs that they have acted
correctly, Scudamore and Richards sent out a six-page explanation earlier
this week.

Whelan has led the call for evidence that the third-party agreement between
West Ham and Tevez's owners had been terminated, and in Tuesday's letter the
Premier League said officials had received the following prior to the
deadline of noon on April 28:

A LETTER from West Ham United sent to Tevez, MSI and JSI terminating the
private agreement between them dated August 30, 2006, and notifying those
parties that the private agreement shall cease to have any further force or
effect.

A LETTER from the legal representatives of MSI and JSI acknowledging receipt
of the above letter.

A LETTER confirming that the above letter had been served on Tevez
personally.

In Whelan's opinion, however, the key question remains unanswered because at
no point do the Premier League say they received confirmation from MSI that
the agreement had been terminated.

It also amazes Wigan officials that it took less than 24 hours for West Ham
to satisfy the Premier League that selecting Tevez was no longer a breach of
their rules when it took Liverpool five weeks to gain the same clearance for
Javier Mascherano, who joined West Ham with Tevez last August.

In the meantime, the Premier League know they have a legal battle with
Sheffield United on their hands that is being monitored by FIFA. A statement
from Bramall Lane said: "Sheffield United is challenging the legality of the
League Commission's decision to hand West Ham a fine rather than (as had
been universally expected) docking West Ham points and cancelling the
registration of Mr Tevez.

Sheffield United also challenges the Premier League's conduct in failing to
conduct an adequate investigation into the continued fielding of Tevez after
the April 27 decision despite serious questions over his eligibility (which
remain unresolved), or to get sufficient evidence as to continuing
third-party influence over Tevez.

Sheffield United will argue that the League should have cancelled Mr Tevez's
registration in the absence of such evidence."

In addition, Sheffield United want to see "the setting up of a new
disciplinary hearing against West Ham, with the hearing to consider the
issue of the club's continued fielding of Tevez". At the same time, they
believe there should be "a hold on preparations for next season which
wrongly assume that West Ham remains a Premiership club and Sheffield United
is relegated to the Championship".

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Reo-Coker warns of the 107 steps to Cup heaven - This Is London
16.05.07

IF things had gone anywhere near to plan, Nigel Reo-Coker would have led out
a London Premiership club to play in the first ever FA Cup Final at the new
Wembley.

But, as the price of the new stadium went up roughly in proportion with
Brian Barwick's blood pressure, the West Ham captain knew fairly early on
last season that he had as much chance of being a Cup Final pioneer, as
Carlos Tevez has of being voted Sheffield United's player of the year.

There was, however, some consolation for Reo-Coker, who was the first
England captain to lead a team out at the new £800million stadium when the
builders finally departed. The 22-year-old midfielder was skipper of the
England Under-21 team which drew 2-2 with Italy.

He recalled: "It was a big shame we didn't play in the first Cup Final at
the new Wembley. It would somehow have been right since West Ham contested
the first Final back at the old place in 1923.

"It was one of the most disappointing things about last season for me."

Reo-Coker never made it to the twin towers so it's difficult to make a
comparison, but is he impressed by the new place?

He said: "It lived up to all my expectations and I will never forget playing
there. The first thing you notice, when you're still miles from the stadium,
is that arch. There is a sense of anticipation as soon as that comes into
view. Then to walk through that tunnel and be the first England captain to
cross that white line is an experience I will cherish for ever.

"To see all those seats, it's enormous and you could see why, if it was full
of England fans, it could be quite daunting for the opposition.

I can only imagine what it will be like with a 90,000 crowd and two sets of
passionate fans. It should be something special on Saturday."

The climb up to the Royal Box is also a little more challenging. "At the old
place it was 39 steps, but now you have to climb 107 steps," said Reo-Coker.

"You walk up close by the side of the fans and then you go back inside and
climb a few steel steps before emerging again.

"It's a long walk. If you win it won't be a problem but if you lose I can
imagine it will seem like it takes forever."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Premiership Rumour Mill: Sheringham at the centre of a tug-of-war - This Is
London
16.05.07

Teddy Sheringham will be involved in a summer tug-of-war between Charlton
and Millwall - if he doesn't join the rush to riches in the United States.
New York Red Bulls wants the former Tottenham, Manchester United and England
star to team up with ex-Aston Villa marksman Juan Pablo Angel. But Alan
Pardew wants Sheringham's vast experience at The Valley to help the Addicks
bounce straight back into the Premiership after their relegation to the
Championship.
Pardew took the skilful striker to Upton Park when he was West Ham boss but
Sheringham fell out of favour when Alan Curbishley took control and has been
released by the Hammers.
Millwall would love to take Sheringham full circle and take him back to The
Den, where he started his illustrious career but manager Willie Donachie
would have to offer him a coaching role on his staff to enjoy any success.

West Ham are preparing to replace Nigel Reo-Coker by signing Scott Parker
from Newcastle while Bolton are bracing themselves for a raid from new
Newcastle boss Sam Allardyce with Kevin Nolan his top target - a move which
would help to finally propel the abrasive midfielder into the England squad.


::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham 'not in rule breach' - The Sun
By JIM MUNRO
May 16, 2007

PREMIER LEAGUE officials have sent a six-page letter to all 20 club chairmen
outlining why West Ham were not docked points over the Carlos Tevez affair.
It also states that the Hammers have satisfactorily terminated the
"offending third party agreement" surrounding Tevez's move and are therefore
"not continuing to be in breach" of Premier League rules. Chief executive
Richard Scudamore and chairman Sir Dave Richards have put their name to the
document which states that the punishment meted out to West Ham, in the form
of a £5.5m fine, was "in accordance with our Rules".

The key extracts from that letter are as follows:

"At no point were West Ham United charged with playing an ineligible player
- both (Carlos) Tevez and (Javier) Mascherano were registered on August 31.
All the required documentation was received by the Premier League and the
usual confirmations received and sent. Registration is definitive as to the
status of the player. At no time has Mr Tevez's registration been revoked or
terminated and at all times he has been eligible to play for West Ham."

"The Independent Commission was...convened strictly in accordance with the
rules as agreed by all member clubs. Its chair, Simon Bourne-Arton QC, acted
very promptly and properly, laying out directions for the hearing in the
shortest possible timescale."

"The Independent Commission carried its work out fully in accordance with
our rules, having adopted practices entirely consistent with formal judicial
proceedings. In reaching their decision the Independent Commission clearly
considered the matter very carefully and did not deliver an irrational or
extreme judgement and delivered the sanction that only they (having
considered the matter fully and in light of copious evidence) deemed to be
proportionate and appropriate."

"The media, and of course those aggrieved by the decision, have analysed the
seven reasons given by the Independent Commission for not deducting points
and concentrated on those that to them seem the least convincing. However,
there are others that have a less convenient truth, particularly the one
that says, 'had the club in time made disclosure of the third party
contracts to the FAPL, then, in all probability, contracts could have been
entered into which would not
have offended the rules'."

"The League could not function if other clubs could effectively intervene in
an attempt to overturn decisions not to their liking."

"Given the complexities around this, we would ask you to step back from the
detail and consider the matter in more general terms:

1. Tevez has been properly registered to play for West Ham United since 31
August 2006. The Board, under our Rules, is charged with the authority to
determine this.

2. He continues to be registered with West Ham United.

3. This is a case without precedent and certainly cannot be compared with
Clubs who have played unregistered players or players ineligible through
suspension.

4. On 26 April West Ham United admitted to breaches of Rules B13 and U18 -
for which they have been fined in accordance with our Rules.

5. The offending third party agreement has been terminated by West Ham
United and therefore they are not continuing to be in breach."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Trial by television - KUMB
Filed: Wednesday, 16th May 2007
By: Peter Coombs

Imagine a situation last Sunday whereby Carlos Tevez had for whatever reason
not played for West Ham; instead Marlon Harewood had started the game.

Imagine also that during the game Harewood had been put through on goal and
been fouled by Wes Brown when clean through. Imagine that Wes Brown was only
booked for the challenge and with Tevez not on the pitch, the resulting free
kick was hit straight at the wall.

Imagine lastly that with the game at Old Trafford being nil-nil after 90
minutes and with Wigan winning at Sheffield United, Wes Brown had then
popped up with an injury time winner to send West Ham down. An imaginary
scenario yes, but not beyond the realms of possibility as we have seen with
certain decisions made this season in the Premiership (and those of us who
remember Ronald Koeman's free kick in the 1994 World Cup qualifiers).

Would West Ham have grounds to ask for the game to be replayed - or at the
very least have Wes Brown suspended for the Cup Final - if trial by
television had showed he was guilty of a red card offence? There would
certainly be people asking for this, but in our heart of hearts we would all
know that the answer to that would always be and to protect the integrity of
the game's officials, have to be no. Because the referee, the game's
official, had meted out the punishment he saw fit at the time the offence
was committed.

The rules are clear; if a player is punished for an offence on the field of
play, the punishment cannot be increased after the event unless the referee
has not seen the offence and has taken no action at the time of it. The
offence can be micro-analysed by the Sky cameras a million times, and from
every conceivable angle - but the result stands. This one incident would not
have relegated West Ham – our poor performance over the course of the
38-game season would have done.

So to West Ham and the Tevez, Mascherano affair. Having been punished for
our offence should we then be punished further because a team then finds
themselves in the Championship next season having been 10 points ahead of us
earlier in the campaign? The answer as above, is no; it goes against the
principles, spirit and laws of the game. The officials see the offence, they
punish the guilty party and the game moves on.

I do feel genuine sympathy for Sheffield United and their fans; the
Premiership needs clubs with large loyal following and a famous name (sorry
Wigan, that doesn't include you) and I do hope they come straight back up.
Relegation is never nice, but the knee jerk reaction to ask for West Ham to
take their place is clearly wrong. It's emotion rather than sense speaking.

The reasons Sheffield United got relegated are clear; they were not good
enough over 38 games – not the fault of West Ham United. Had Phil Jagielka
decided not to play basketball in his own area on Sunday they would have
stayed up - West Ham United cannot be blamed for this. Had the post been
half an inch thinner and Danny Webber's effort had not rebounded back off
the upright they would have stayed up – again, not West Ham's fault. We have
taken our punishment and got on with it, the other clubs should have done
the same.

In a case whereby punishment is meted and then successfully challenged by an
aggrieved third party we set a dangerous precedent. If West Ham had been
relegated could we have asked for our game against Newcastle in January to
be replayed because we had a perfectly good goal disallowed that would have
put us 3-1 up. Could we ask for Liverpool to be forced to replay their
recent game with Fulham and play a stronger side than they did? No because
it would be utter carnage. Challenge would follow counter challenge and the
game being played on the pitch would be replaced by it being played out in
the courtrooms and arbitration rooms up and down the country.

A lot of what is driving the current push to have West Ham further punished
is the media; we are now to an extent a victim of the so-called trial by
television, or newspaper. Why have the media given so many column inches to
this? Because it is a good story and it sells.

Look guys - the relegated clubs are aggrieved; they feel West Ham staying up
is because, being a bigger club, they were not punished the same way smaller
clubs would have been. Let's stoke the flame, let's make it a soap opera
that can fill the back pages over the summer when there is no football being
played. This sells papers so milk it for what is worth.

Football carries a lot of emotion, especially at the end of the season.
Relegation is the end of the world. Those who experience it will cling to
any faint hopes that by a technicality they can carry on in the Premiership
gravy train. And the media lap the story up – it's their job. Given the
column inches and television coverage, those who feel they have been on the
wrong end of an injustice suddenly begin to believe that their cause has the
backing of the football world and this gives them hope. But the media are
not on their side; they just love a story that sells.

The so-called 'gang of four' agreed to stick together no matter who went
down before matters were decided last Sunday. This is obviously an insurance
policy for all of those involved; one team may go so let's agree to stick
together before hand. For Wigan and Fulham this is now a case of
old-fashioned musketeer spirit – one for all and all for one and about an
agreement concocted before any of these teams were safe. Not about what they
feel is right or wrong. But I go back to my original point. We have faced
the panel, been found guilty of an offence and have received punishment.

As to the offence itself, third party ownership of a player. I believe this
now sets a precedent whereby loans between Premiership clubs should now be
made illegal. The case of Manchester United this season playing four of
their 38 games against reserve goalkeepers due to the loans and transfer
clauses of Ben Foster at Watford and Tim Howard at Manchester United shows
that Premiership games can be influenced by third party ownership. Had Tim
Howard played for Everton in the recent game at Goodison would he have
dropped the same ball that Iain Turner did to give Manchester United their
lifeline. Will Chelsea be suing over this?

West Ham made a technical error with regards to the player's contracts and
MSI. We held our hands up and bought the error to the attention of the
Premier League. The current administration at the club has acted fairly and
above board and a £5.5million fine was deemed to be fit punishment. There is
an argument that playing a player not owned by West Ham is reason enough to
have points deducted. Will Wigan dock themselves points for the games won
and drew when Chris Kirkland, on loan from Liverpool, played for them?

There is also an argument that by tearing up the original contract and
"re-signing Tevez" that we created our own transfer window to do this.
Middlesbrough signed Jonathan Woodgate permanently outside of the transfer
window thereby changing the contract they had with both Real Madrid and the
player. Will they dock themselves the last six points they gained this
season?

To make our game's rules watertight there should be no grey areas. The clubs
should own players that play for them in the Premier League and loans should
be for their original purpose, for young players to again experience in the
lower leagues.

The league need to look at this and draw up a clear set of rules governing
ownership of players and allow all clubs in the competition a set period to
get their houses in order. Set punishments should also be clearly written,
circulated and agreed on with regards to the future breaking of these rules
and as is already the case, all 20 clubs in the league need to agree to
abide by and agree with any punishment that is given out in future breaches
of the rule book.

One of the things I agree with Paul Jewell on, is the timing of the
commission, which probably did give West Ham a boost a day before the game
with Wigan. On the other side of the coin any points deduction would have
had the same positive effect for Wigan. One team was always going to lose in
this situation. These things need to be investigated but the timing needs to
be thought about and where possible avoided at the business end of the
season.

West Ham made a mistake during a previous regime, we were punished. It is
not up to us to decide when, where and how severely we are punished. This is
up to the Premier League and their independent commission. They have acted
and we all live by that decision. It's time the media and the "gang of four"
accept this and concentrate their efforts on next season, one that promises
to be one the toughest Premier League and Championship seasons ever.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Lies, damned lies and ... Kevin McCabe - KUMB
Filed: Wednesday, 16th May 2007
By: Gordon Thrower


With all the rubbish spoken by Wigan's Dave Whelan and, more recently
Sheffield United's Kevin McCabe we thought it was about time we had a rant
of our own. Gordon Thrower bravely fought off a streaming cold caught as a
result of his four day trek to Manchester to come up with this …

I've had enough. Firstly I'm getting lectured on morals by someone who has
been convicted of illegal price-fixing and who apparently thought nothing of
stocking his shops with stuff made by child slave labour. Well at least
Whelan seems to have shut up for the time being.

However, no sooner does one ignorant rent-a-quote idiot shut up then another
steps forward to replace him. Step forward Kevin "Hard Of Thinking" McCabe.
Like John Madejski before him here is another who is clearly of the opinion
that if you repeat a lie often enough everyone will believe it.

I read with disbelief the statement issued by him this afternoon on his
proposed "arbitration proceedings", amazed that any half-reputable law firm
could have put its name to something with more holes in it than Torquay's
defence.

"Sheffield United is challenging the legality of the League Commission's
decision to hand West Ham a fine rather than (as had been universally
expected) docking West Ham points and cancelling the registration of Mr
Tevez.

Universally expected? I think not. Indeed a random search of newspaper
articles in the period leading up to the decision would suggest quite the
opposite. Of course if McCabe were to replace the words "universally
expected" with "hoped for by me in case we didn't get enough points to stay
up" we'd be closer to the truth.

"Sheffield United will argue that the Commission's decisions must meet, and
in this case failed to meet, the same general obligations as those required
of public bodies, namely to act lawfully, fairly and reasonably. It falls to
the League's arbitration body to perform the same role as the High Court
would in reviewing decisions issued by the League's disciplinary
commission."

The decision was lawful, fair and reasonable. What it wasn't was what McCabe
wanted, which was a pre-judged, unlawful and unreasonable decision based on
his club's need to compensate for their inability to gain enough points to
stay up.

"Sheffield United also challenges the Premier League's conduct in failing to
conduct an adequate investigation into the continued fielding of Tevez after
the 27 April decision despite serious questions over his eligibility (which
still remain unresolved), or to get sufficient evidence as to continuing
third party influence over Tevez. Sheffield United will argue that the
League should have cancelled Mr Tevez's registration in the absence of such
evidence; and/or that further disciplinary proceedings should have been
instituted against West Ham for failing effectively to resolve their ongoing
breach of Premier League rules as regards Tevez's registration.

So many lies all in one place. The Premier League did conduct an adequate
investigation into Tevez's status and were furnished with documentary
evidence of his eligibility. His eligibility does not therefore "remain
unresolved". Since there were no breaches of Premier League rules there
could not have been an ongoing breach. This statement in itself contains a
number of wilful falsehoods and it contravenes a number of Premier League
rules concerning the conduct of clubs and officials.

"Sheffield United will seek:

a declaration that the original decision and subsequent failure to act were
unlawful, and that the decision should therefore be set aside;"

As we have seen the decision was lawful and there was no "subsequent failure
to act". Seeking a declaration that this was the case would be like me
seeking a declaration that black is in fact white.

"the setting up of a new disciplinary hearing against West Ham, with the
hearing to consider the issue of the club's continued fielding of Tevez;"

Or in other words "Oh let's keep going until we get the decision I want".
The original hearing was lawful. The club's continued fielding of Tevez was
done with the consent and full knowledge of the Premier League. End of.

"a hold on preparations for next season which wrongly assume that West Ham
remains a Premiership club and Sheffield United is relegated to the
Championship;"

The preparations for next season RIGHTLY assume that Sheffield United are
down. This would be because they gained 38 points and had an inferior
goal-difference to Wigan. Down. End Of.

and

"an assessment of the clubs' potential claim for damages.

I'll do that bit for you McCabe - it's £0.00.

Maybe if you sue Jagielka on his way out of the front door for his
inexplicable handball you might make a few more quid. That one moment of
madness had infinitely more to do with Sheffield United's relegation than
anything that happened in E13.

"In light of the significance and urgency of the issues in dispute,
Sheffield United has called for the new tribunal to be established by the
end of this week and to make its decision within four weeks".

How about this: in the light of the fact that your case is based on a tissue
of lies and inaccuracies, how about you disappear with "urgency" now before
someone discovers just how many Premier League rules you have broken by
issuing this travesty of a statement.

Goodbye McCabe, mind you don't choke on the traditional hearty breakfast on
your way out.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
FIFA have to stamp on this, says Ardiles - Daily Mail
by CHRIS WHEELER
Last updated at 07:32am on 17th May 2007

Ossie Ardiles has expressed his concern over the deal that took Carlos Tevez
and Javier Mascherano to West Ham last summer. Ardiles, a 1978 World
Cup-winner with Argentina and a Tottenham legend, said: "It's not good for
football and something FIFA must stamp out. These fines and the threat of
court action have hurt football's image and we must stop it happening again.
"It hasn't surprised people in Argentina because there is so much going on
with these third-party arrangements. You never know who the owner is until
you start doing business. "Because of the economic situation in Argentina
and Brazil, it is happening more and more. Some players are owned by big
international companies. "It isn't just happening in South America, but
Africa and elsewhere. I was coaching the top team in Jersusalem last year
and I was in Japan before that. Everywhere I go players have third-party
deals. FIFA have to look at it."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Plot thickens in Tévez wrangle as Whelan calls for heads to roll - Times
Gary Jacob and Peter Lansley

The FA Premier League came under renewed pressure last night from the "Gang
of Four" incensed by its handling of the Carlos Tévez affair. Wigan Athletic
called for the "resignation" of Sir Dave Richards, the Premier League
chairman, and Richard Scudamore, the chief executive, and Sheffield United
have taken the first steps in their legal challenge to have West Ham United
deducted points for breaching League rules in the transfer of the Argentina
forward.

In a letter shown to The Times, Dave Whelan, the Wigan chairman, questions
the conduct of the two League officials since the independent commission
imposed a fine of £5.5 million on West Ham last month. Whelan queries the
time it took to clear Tévez to play when the League had been given the power
by the independent commission to remove the forward's registration.

The Premier League board, made up of Scudamore, Richards and Mike Foster,
the company secretary, took that decision within hours of the judgment being
announced in the early afternoon of April 27. "It required full discussion
and was a dereliction of duties," Whelan said.

The Wigan chairman then asks for their resignation. He also reiterates that
the League has failed to provide the evidence that West Ham cancelled the
agreement with the companies that own the economic rights to Tévez. The
League has said that it has seen West Ham's termination of the contract with
Media Sports Investment and Just Sport, as well as a letter from the
companies acknowledging receipt.

However, the League claims that it cannot ask the companies if they have
terminated the agreement because they do not come under its jurisdiction.

The League has said that it is willing to debate third-party agreements at
the meeting of the Barclays Premiership clubs in two weeks. "The board will
be giving careful consideration to how we might learn lessons from this
situation to protect the future interests of the League and its member
clubs," the League said in a six-page letter to the clubs yesterday.

Last night, the League was considering its response to Sheffield United's
request for an arbitration panel. The club, relegated to the Coca-Cola
Championship on Sunday, want a three-man tribunal appointed to consider the
decision to fine West Ham rather than dock points. The League's rules for
deciding disputes this way say that arbitration is "binding".

United are seeking a "hold on preparations for next season which wrongly
assume that West Ham remains a Premiership club" and "an assessment of the
clubs' potential claim for damages".

Neil Warnock stepped down as manager after 7½ years yesterday, suggesting
that the Tévez affair had forced him out. But he said that he "would be on
the phone like a shot" to reapply for his job should the Yorkshire club be
reinstated.

"A number of issues over the past few weeks have left a bitter taste,"
Warnock said. "If things had worked out differently, I'd be sitting here
signing a new contract and talking about trying to get into Europe. I don't
feel as if we've been relegated, though the maths of the table say we have.
These experiences just drive me on to want to come back and try to put one
over on one or two people.

"The commissioner, when I read the report, said he felt sorry for West Ham
fans and if the inquiry had taken place earlier in the season it would have
been a points deduction. He should have been at Bramall Lane on Sunday with
me, having a chat with our fans."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Benayoun's departure could trigger exodus at West Ham - The Independent
By Jason Burt
Published: 17 May 2007

Yossi Benayoun will have a showdown meeting with West Ham United today in
which he is likely to ask for a transfer from the Premiership club. The
Israeli midfielder is unhappy at the way he has been treated by the manager
Alan Curbishley, who has endured a difficult relationship with several
players at the club.

Benayoun's discontent - the meeting is at his request - is likely to become
a test as to whether or not West Ham execute the wholesale clear-out that
was threatened earlier this season. However, since then they have maintained
their top-flight status and there is also a feeling from some within the
club that there should be an attempt to retain several of the unhappy
players such as Anton Ferdinand - whose move to Newcastle United has fallen
through - and Nigel Reo-Coker.

The meeting comes the day after Curbishley met with West Ham chairman Eggert
Magnusson to discuss the club's summer transfer targets. At the top of the
list will be Barcelona's Eidur Gudjohnsen, although he is not believed to be
keen on a move to Upton Park.

The 27-year-old Benayoun was close to leaving West Ham last summer when
there was interest from Liverpool and Arsenal but, in the end, no bid was
made. He was offered a new contract, which would have earned him about
£40,000 a week, but the deal was not signed.

It is believed that Curbishley was particularly unhappy that Benayoun was
able to play for Israel in their European Championship qualifier against
England at a time when he was apparently struggling for fitness.

Curbishley is thought to be have been so angry with Benayoun that, for a
time, he refused to speak to him. However, the midfielder was reinstated for
West Ham's run-in and played a crucial role in their survival.

Despite that, it is understood that he would prefer to leave the club. He
has also interested Portsmouth and, following Sam Allardyce taking over at
Newcastle United, they too could be a potential bidder.

Others who may depart include Marlon Harewood, who interests Spurs and
Wigan, and Paul Konchesky, who may move to Aston Villa. Hayden Mullins,
along with goalkeeper Jimmy Walker, could join Alan Pardew at Charlton.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Kia denies transfer talks over West Ham's Tevez
tribalfooball.com - May 16, 2007

Kia Joorabchian insists no talks have been held over the future of West Ham
United striker Carlos Tevez. Joorabchian, who controls Tevez's affairs, told
the Daily Mail: "West Ham's board have to decide what their intentions are.
"Maybe they will think they want Carlos and build around him. Or maybe they
will think that, for the money, they can buy four or five great players
instead. "We haven't held talks with any club, contrary to what you might
have read. This morning it was Inter Milan for £25m, the other day it was
Real Madrid for £30m. These stories are the work of fiction. "He has a
great affection for the club - and the supporters. The decision on his
future is his. He has been very happy there. I have a great respect for
Eggert Magnusson, I believe they will be very successful in the future. Even
though I didn't buy the club, I have zero hard feelings towards them. "As
for Carlos, you must remember, he is only 23. He will get better and
better."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham in Newcastle talks for Parker
tribalfooball.com - May 16, 2007

West Ham United have already made contact with Newcastle United over the
availability of midfielder Scott Parker. Hammers boss Alan Curbishley, who
knows Parker from their days together at Charlton, has made the Toon captain
a top target for the summer market. Curbishley is willing to offer £8
million for the England international, who has a frosty relationship with a
section of the Newcastle support.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Charlton move for West Ham pair
tribalfooball.com - May 16, 2007

Charlton Athletic boss Alan Pardew is going back to old club West Ham for
two players. Midfielder Hayden Mullins and goalkeeper Jimmy Walker are both
wanted by Pardew for next season's Championship campaign.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham's Konchesky wanted by Villa
tribalfooball.com - May 16, 2007

Aston Villa are eyeing West Ham fullback Paul Konchesky. Hammers boss Alan
Curbishley isn't expected to stand in Konchesky's way should he seek a move
this summer.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Benayoun to ask away from West Ham today
tribalfooball.com - May 16, 2007

Yossi Benayoun is expected to demand a transfer in talks today at West Ham
United. The Independent says the Israeli midfielder is unhappy at the way he
has been treated by the manager Alan Curbishley, who has endured a difficult
relationship with several players at the club.

Benayoun was close to leaving West Ham last summer when there was interest
from Liverpool and Arsenal but, in the end, no bid was made. He was offered
a new contract, which would have earned him about £40,000 a week, but the
deal was not signed. He has also interested Portsmouth and, following Sam
Allardyce taking over at Newcastle United, they too could be a potential
bidder.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
West Ham's Noble: East End now happy
tribalfooball.com - May 16, 2007

West Ham midfielder Mark Noble says London's East End is now "a happy place"
after they clinched Premiership survival at Manchester United on Sunday.

The youngster told whufc.com: "It was a day of mixed emotions for me, I was
crying afterwards but that's how I showed my emotion. I wanted to win so
badly and it never happened. Obviously I scored early on and it was a
rollercoaster game. But it was all worth it and we can look back on it now
and say it was the catalyst for what we've done."

Premiership status secured, Mark admitted he could breathe a sigh of relief.
"We're not worrying about anyone else now and next season we can prove
ourselves," he said.

"We've got out of the sticky patch of the difficult second season in the
Premiership and we can push on a do well and hopefully do as well as we did
in the first season - or better.

"I was looking up to the fans, we had a bit of eye contact, me and my
friends. It was a fantastic day, they were as happy as me. But everyone
knows how important it is to this Club, being in the Premiership, and the
East End is a happy place to be now."

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

http://vyperz.blogspot.com